Search results

Repetition of a claim is not proof of its validity.

How about somebody who had homeopathy but didn't recover? Even, in fact, got worse?

And they call patients hysterical snowflakes. :rolleyes:

I smell desperation.

The 21 member committee had five lay members rather than the usual two, Bloody peasants wanting to have a say about their own lives. Who do they think they are? :rolleyes:

:thumbup:

It is unclear, however, how the evidence became unsupportive. Might help if you open your eyes. I feel comforted by it. :thumbsup:

That was never going to happen. They are too far gone. Cut them loose, and leave them behind in the dust of history, I say.

This is getting a bit weird. Are the CBT-GET people resigning in protest? I don't know whether to be worried or hopeful. :confused:

Individualised to the point of being meaningless. It is just the latest buzz word to distract from the fact those using it have nothing to offer. Same old shit.

In the absence of objective data, Let that sink in. In the absence of objective data, anything goes. Which is why the 'subjectively defined' claim is so prominent in the psychosocial arguments. It is their get out of jail free card.

Heads they win. Tails we lose. It's GET or CBT, or both.

This is good news. Thanks.

*sigh*

Yes, let's not make AfME the scapegoat for all the other more serious failures across the board.

Mixed feelings. AfME are now heading in the right direction. Constructive criticism and engagement with them seems more a more productive path than this approach. But they do have a way to travel yet, and they really do need to publicly acknowledge their role in PACE and apologise for it. The...

I offer a free organic disposal service loving home for all unwanted black rice pudding.

There it is.

Just don't try to infringe on my patent for black rice pudding therapy (BLARPUT™).