So the results didn't fit their mental framework, but one just had to say that these results didn't mean what they mean, and here we are, no changes to the conclusion. (And quickly sweep the question of the validity of a tool that says that patients suffering a "recognised organic disease" are...
:jawdrop:
There seriously is something wrong with psychology, which, for the most part, has nothing to do with science.
But here, it is so obvious, I just can't believe it. It's not flaws anymore, it needs to be called what it is, it's f* fraud! And the way research in psychology is organised...
MS:
"everybody can go to twitter and they will see not very pleasant comments to me"
Did MS engaging on twitter have ever had any aim other than collecting "abusive" replies?
Anyway, I hope people will go to see how he treats anyone with a different view from his.
It seems there are more and more people outside the traditional "ME community" coming into the debate with some knowledge of the real problems with CBT/GET trials.
Eg: Dearden's response is spot on
Is she admiting that patients have to be submissive for her to feel OK?
If she doesn't feel superior, omnipotent and allmighty, she gets anxious?
Patients are not here to make you feel great, Clare. Try cocaine and leave them alone.
There have so far only been one sided articles and not a balanced one to counteract. But in total (and if things don't get worse in the following days, fingers crossed), the Reuters story has only be reused by a small number of second rate newspapers.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.