"Amend the regulations that determine whether mental health issues are assessed as putting claimants at ‘Substantial Risk’ if they are required to...
lucky really that we can trust our charities to respond to these consultations so forcefully and put our case in such a way that makes it clear...
elsewhere, mobility and getting about downgraded, continence and social engagement stay the same. it's about half of what they were talking about....
"Amending the LCWRA Substantial Risk regulations to realign Substantial Risk with its original intention of only applying in exceptional...
yeah, i saw that. possibly the one proof that some of the worst things they've ever done can actually be reversed at some pt, it's been a brutal...
i was just thinking that. he's making a lot of noise around this now but i'm sure when they announced the white paper on getting rid of the WCA...
tbh i feel like i've had it anyway, i was given either 50/50 and zero chance of winning my appeal for LCWRA last time by two advisors (tho i did)...
this really has al the hallmarks of the original 2008 WCA reforms, which ended up being softened in practice because they were such a catastrophe...
beyond which, they don't protect you from much these days anyway, esp if yr making an appeal. you wonder how the severely ill are supposed to...
he's announced the changes but there's zero detail afaict (tbf i'm not watching the damn thing). i guess we'll have to wait for the documents
won't be sat here for long but i'll say anything relevant while i can pay attention. 1. some good news (no really): benefits to be uprated at...
Agree totally, i've written all the messaging off as playing to the crowd. otoh if this is all irrelevant, it does at least mean what they'll...
My feeling at the time was that it was testing the water but they wouldn't do the hardest measures, there was a certain diffidence to the way they...
Do we know how hard they're going on this yet? i've been looking at coverage today and i can't figure out if "tightening" the criteria for...
some of it is definitely factually wrong eg LCW don't get extra money to lose (edit; ive misread this, it doesn't say that but the two groups...
I've no doubt that it is the plan. I am also well aware of how the job centre works. How far these things end up happening is not yet set in stone...
I've read the consultation. This is a suggestion, they can either remove them altogether or make it so that none of those areas could score 15...
Some positive news here, given i strongly suspect labour will be the ones doing all this stuff...
looking at the twitter feed: no
In my recent experience this is even more clear. Guidance to job centres is explicit that claimants should be moved twds ever more difficult...
Separate names with a comma.
