That is the case in its current iteration.
By linking PIP to LCWRA/UC Health in the future, it will be difficult to separate them even though there will still be in-work PIP claimants.
I think that’s already occurred to the disabled campaigners who have been working tirelessly on this for months… Google is your friend for government figures.
If the bill was defeated it would be taken away and re-written. Instead, it’s been amended and passed. Either version will still result in disability benefits being cut, to be honest. It’s just a stay of execution.
2/3rds of my income and I’d lose some of the remaining third because I’d be sanctioned for not looking for work.
Under the original proposals, PIP is 1/3, lost as I don’t get 4 points. LCWRA or UC Health as it’s known now is 1/3, lost as I don’t get PIP. Also carer would lose allowance as you...
5.5billion was just said to be the values of the “concession” black hole, allegedly, which is about 1.5 years worth.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdjxygjrk9ro
Well they’re saying they won’t implement the 4 points until after the report is published next year. They shouldn’t be implementing anything until that inquiry is finished anyway, what’s the point of it, it’s a review of PIP.
It’s a concession- to not do what they shouldn’t have been doing anyway.
Oh please do reference the blog post in the early phase, say April-July 2020 ish, where he refers to looking to Cochrane and it not being of use (I’m paraphrasing)
It’s not often I miss the early 90s tv studio talk show format, but I think this would make a good show in the style of Kilroy or Tricia, where Garner could tell people his story then audience members could question him from their own experience
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.