To update the development:
The IQWiG wanted to include 3 Experts for ME/CFS for their review.
They changed that to two doctors who are familiar with ME/CFS and a psychiatrist or psychotherapist who is familiar with ME/CFS.
I contacted a known psychiatrist in germany who says that CBT/GET are...
obviously the most important part is what diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS has been used in the studies to be considered a study they include in their report. They only say "for example canadian consensus criteria or other data that makes it plausible that the patients had ME/CFS"
I think thats...
Here is their press release:
https://www.iqwig.de/presse/pressemitteilungen/pressemitteilungen-detailseite_40832.html<
And here again the DeepL translated version in english:
https://1drv.ms/b/s!AohT_k4FnlZ-hBy8x7aPdYvQMBhA?e=rMcaPC
Thanks for the idea.
Here is the document translated with deepL which usually produces better results than google translate
https://1drv.ms/b/s!AohT_k4FnlZ-hBt1MkxzGTFWtjtd?e=2LcvbX
The IQWIG revealed their method of creating a report about the current situation of ME/CFS for the german government.
https://www.iqwig.de/download/n21-01_me-cfs-aktueller-kenntnisstand_berichtsplan_v1-0.pdf?rev=209654
I wonder if we have any members here who are familiar with such a process...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.