Trial Report A Novel Nomogram for Early Identification of CFS-Like Symptoms in University Students with Infectious Mononucleosis, 2024, Sun

Discussion in 'ME/CFS research' started by Dolphin, Aug 29, 2024.

  1. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,584
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1155/2024/3256273

    Sun, Deping, Liang, Yanan, Yang, Fuwei, Liu, Lan, Yan, Yuqin, A Novel Nomogram for Early Identification of CFS-Like Symptoms in University Students with Infectious Mononucleosis, Advances in Public Health, 2024, 3256273, 10 pages, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3256273

    A Novel Nomogram for Early Identification of CFS-Like Symptoms in University Students with Infectious Mononucleosis

    Deping Sun, Yanan Liang, Fuwei Yang, Lan Liu, Yuqin Yan
    First published: 24 August 2024

    https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3256273


    Abstract

    Objective
    .

    This study aims to develop and evaluate a nomogram for predicting the risk of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)-like symptoms in university students diagnosed with infectious mononucleosis (IM), using clinical characteristics and laboratory findings as predictive variables. The nomogram will be designed to assist healthcare providers in assessing the likelihood of CFS-like symptoms developing post-IM, rather than providing a definitive diagnosis of CFS.

    Methods
    .

    Clinical data and laboratory findings were collected from university students with IM. The variables included age, gender, smoking and drinking habits, relationship status, university grade, residence registration, number of symptoms and signs (NSS), body mass index (BMI), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte–lymphocyte ratio (MLR), aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase ratio (AST/ALT, DeRitis), basophil percentage (Baso%), eosinophil percentage (Eos%), and albumin-to-globulin ratio (ALB/GLO). LASSO regression analysis was employed to identify significant predictors of CFS-like symptoms. A nomogram model was constructed based on these predictors and evaluated using performance metrics such as the concordance index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.

    Results
    .

    The LASSO regression analysis identified the NSS, CRP, NLR, and MLR as significant predictors of CFS-like symptoms in university students with IM. The nomogram demonstrated robust predictive performance, with a C-index of 0.846 (95% CI: 0.790–0.902) in the training set and 0.867 (95% CI: 0.8–0.954) in the validation set. High AUC values indicated excellent overall predictive accuracy. Calibration curves revealed a close match between predicted and observed probabilities. Additionally, decision curve analysis showed positive net benefits across a broad spectrum of threshold probabilities, underscoring the nomogram’s clinical applicability.

    Conclusion
    .

    The nomogram developed in this study serves as a valuable predictive tool for assessing the risk of CFS-like symptoms in university students with IM. The identified predictors, including NLR, the NSS, CRP, and MLR, can assist clinicians in evaluating individual risk profiles and inform decision-making processes. This nomogram model advances personalized risk assessment for the development of CFS-like symptoms in IM-affected university students.
     
    ME/CFS Skeptic and Kitty like this.
  2. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,584
    2.2. Assessment of Fatigue
    Fatigue symptoms were evaluated using the Chalder fatigue scale (CFQ-11) [22, 24]. This instrument (Table 1) comprises 11 items, each rated on a scale from 0 to 3, with total scores ranging from 0 to 33. Higher scores correspond to more pronounced fatigue symptoms. The CFQ-11 is divided into two subscales: physical fatigue (seven items) and mental fatigue (four items). For the purpose of this study, a bimodal scoring system was also utilized, where responses were categorized as 0 (0–1) or 1 (2–3), and the summed scores provided a scale from 0 to 11.

    For the classification of participants based on fatigue severity, we adopted the standard cutoff of ≥4 on the CFQ-11 scale [22]. Participants scoring 4 or above were considered to exhibit CFS-like symptoms, as per the study’s revised focus on symptomatology rather than a clinical diagnosis of CFS.
     
    ME/CFS Skeptic, Ash and Kitty like this.

Share This Page