Cardiac Performance and Cardiopulmonary Fitness After Infection With SARS-CoV-2, 2022, Wood et al

Discussion in 'Long Covid research' started by Andy, Jun 2, 2022.

  1. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    22,399
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Aims: Persistent cardiac symptoms are an increasingly reported phenomenon following COVID-19. However, the underlying cause of cardiac symptoms is unknown. This study aimed to identify the underlying causes, if any, of these symptoms 1 year following acute COVID-19 infection.

    Methods and Results: 22 individuals with persistent cardiac symptoms were prospectively investigated using echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), 6-min walking test, cardio-pulmonary exercise testing and electrocardiography. A median of 382 days (IQR 368, 442) passed between diagnosis of COVID-19 and investigation. As a cohort their echocardiography, CMR, 6-min walking test and exercise testing results were within the normal ranges. There were no differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (61.45 ± 6.59 %), global longitudinal strain (19.80 ± 3.12 %) or tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (24.96 ± 5.55 mm) as measured by echocardiography compared to a healthy control group. VO2 max (2045.00 ± 658.40 ml/min), % expected VO2 max (114.80 ± 23.08 %) and 6-minute distance walked (608.90 ± 54.51 m) exceeded that expected for the patient cohort, whilst Troponin I (5.59 ± 6.59 ng/l) and Nt-proBNP (88.18 ± 54.27 ng/l) were normal.

    Conclusion: Among a cohort of 22 patients with self-reported persistent cardiac symptoms, we identified no underlying cardiac disease or reduced cardiopulmonary fitness 1 year following COVID-19.

    Open access, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.871603/full
     
    ahimsa, DokaGirl and Peter Trewhitt like this.
  2. DokaGirl

    DokaGirl Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,664
    Testing for POTS doesn't seem to have been included. Nor has tilt table, impedance cardiograph, and maybe 2 Day CPET could be considered.

    Standard run-of-the-mill cardio testing may not be enough.
     
    Mij, ahimsa, cfsandmore and 6 others like this.
  3. DokaGirl

    DokaGirl Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,664
    And, Holter monitor testing. This may indicate notable heart rate differences with position of the patient: supine vs upright.

    While wearing the device, the patient is asked to document movement/activities. Upright versus supine heart rate measurements can be noted by the test interpreter. This test may help reveal a problem not found otherwise.
     

Share This Page