Effectiveness of 'motivational interviewing' on sick leave: a randomized controlled trial in a social insurance setting, 2023, Aasdahl et al

Discussion in 'Other health news and research' started by Midnattsol, Aug 28, 2023.

  1. Midnattsol

    Midnattsol Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,778
    Objective
    This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of motivational interviewing (MI) – a counselling approach offered by caseworkers at the Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration (NAV) – on return to work (RTW) for individuals sick-listed for ≥8 weeks due to any diagnoses. MI was compared to usual case management and an active control during 12 months of follow-up.

    Methods
    In a randomized clinical trial with three parallel arms, participants were randomized to MI (N=257), usual case management (N=266), or an active control group (N=252). MI consisted of two MI sessions while the active control involved two sessions without MI, both were offered in addition to usual case management. The primary outcome was number of sickness absence days based on registry data. Secondary outcomes included time to sustainable RTW, defined as four consecutive weeks without medical benefits.

    Results
    The median number of sickness absence days for the MI group was 73 days [interquartile range (IQR) 31–147], 76 days (35–134) for usual care, and 75 days (34–155) for active control. In total 89%, 88% and 86% of the participants, respectively, achieved sustainable RTW. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for time to sustainable RTW was 1.12 (95% CI 0.90–1.40) for MI compared to usual case management and HR 1.16 (95% CI 0.93–1.44) compared to the active control.

    Conclusions
    This study did not provide evidence that MI offered by NAV caseworkers to sick-listed individuals was more effective on RTW than usual case management or an active control. Providing MI in this context could be challenging as only half of the MI group received the intervention

    https://www.sjweh.fi/article/4117
     
    Hutan, RedFox and Trish like this.
  2. Midnattsol

    Midnattsol Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,778
    Last author of this study has also worked on ME/CFS, and is in support of the LP study that is ongoing at the same university as this study.
     
    NelliePledge, Hutan, RedFox and 5 others like this.
  3. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,662
    Location:
    Canada
    Have they tried hypnotizing them? Maybe dousing them in the blood of roosters slaughtered at midnight? Perhaps given them a small voodoo doll in their likeness to cherish and nurture?

    While they're there. Maybe the interviewers didn't try hard enough. Maybe they don't want to do their job and there is a need for motivational coaching for the motivational interviewers. And if that doesn't work, well, hire a bunch of motivational clowns to entertain the motivational coaches so they can properly motivate the motivational interviewers.

    Again, while they're there. Probably the bastards don't want people to get better.
     
  4. Midnattsol

    Midnattsol Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,778
    Pretty sure I've seen comments along the line of "Why is the person that came to my job to 'motivate' us trying to cure patients with the same rubbish?" on social media re the LP study.
     
    Trish and Sean like this.

Share This Page