Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Managing Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Meta-Analysis, 2022, Choo et al

Abstract

Objective
In fibromyalgia, central sensitization is a key mechanism, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been reported to potentially manage symptoms of fibromyalgia. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the therapeutic effect of rTMS in patients with fibromyalgia according to stimulation locations and follow-up time points.

Methods
We searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science databases for articles published from January 1, 1990 to August 26, 2021, including randomized controlled studies investigating the effectiveness of rTMS on managing fibromyalgia.

Results
In total, 10 papers and 299 participants were included. The high-frequency rTMS on the left primary motor cortex (Lt. M1) had a significant effect on pain reduction immediately and 1–4 weeks after the end of the session but had no significant effect after 5–12 weeks. Additionally, after high-frequency rTMS sessions on the Lt. M1, the effect on patients’ quality of life (QoL) appeared late at 5–12 weeks of follow-up. In contrast, high-frequency rTMS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Lt. DLPFC) did not reduce pain from fibromyalgia. The effect on controlling the affective problem was not observed after rTMS treatment on both the Lt. M1 and Lt. DLPFC.

Conclusions
High-frequency rTMS had a positive pain-reducing effect immediately and at 1–4 weeks after completing the rTMS sessions, and the patients’ QoL improved after 5–12 weeks. However, Lt. DLPFC stimulation was not effective in controlling fibromyalgia symptoms.

Paywall, https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/pm/pnab354/6496967

 

“In fibromyalgia, central sensitization is a key mechanism”

Is it?

“repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been reported to potentially manage symptoms of fibromyalgia.”

By whom?

 

Ah, you know how evidence-based medicine works: fake it 'til you make it. Then fake it some more. It's almost all fake, really. Just lying with statistics on a grand scale.

Who knew doing maths with imaginary numbers, wait that's not a good example imaginary numbers are super useful. Really the issue is fake numbers that don't relate to anything in real life. All bets are off when people have decided that reality doesn't matter in what they're doing.