1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for 'CFS'.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 11th November 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! Read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum.
    Dismiss Notice

Estimated incidence of CFS/ME in Norway between 2016-2018, Hilland and Anthun, 2022

Discussion in 'ME/CFS research' started by Midnattsol, Jan 19, 2023.

Tags:
  1. Midnattsol

    Midnattsol Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,778
    Subtitle: "A register study"

    Abstract (translated by me):
    Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalopathy (ME/CFS) is a complex and chronic illness that is associated with a considerable reduction in quality of life for patients. In this study we estimate the incidence rate of ME/CFS in the Norwegian population between 2016-2018.

    Patient data has been collected from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR). The population is defined by all patients treated in the specialist health services diagnosed with ME/CFS between 2016-2018.

    We find that 5556 new patients were diagnosed with ME/CFS in the period between 2016-2018. The incidence rate was 36.1 per 1000 000 person years. Of these, 4347 were women, which means that the incidence rate of women relative to men was 3.7. We find that the occurence of ME varies by age, and we find two age-tops in the groups 15-19 and 35-39 years old. We find a higher incidence for the total population, compared to earlier Norwegian research.

    Edit: Forgot the link. The study is in Norwegian.
    https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/helseforsk/article/view/6535
     
    Midnattsol, Jan 19, 2023
    #1
    Hutan, RedFox, rainy and 11 others like this.
  2. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,670
    Location:
    Canada
    Seems unrealistic considering that most are never officially diagnosed. And in fact it's not just diagnosed, but seen in healthcare services:
    That's still a lot of people, and likely an undercount. And that's not incidence, that's new incidence, among the small % who ever get diagnosed and seen somewhere where they actually record those cases. There go those twin peaks again, but it's impossible to trust the reliability of the data.

    I don't think that the fact that this is constantly happening has really sunk in, there's always been this idea, dating back decades, that this is a fad and eventually the number of cases would drop down to zero. It's the inability to accept that this is caused by infections that breaks everything, a nearly identical conceptual error as the belief that bacteria can't survive stomach acid long enough to cause ulcers.
     
    rvallee, Jan 19, 2023
    #2
    hibiscuswahine, alktipping and Peter Trewhitt like this.
  3. Midnattsol

    Midnattsol Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,778
    I was diagnosed in 2017, but I was not in contact with specialist healthcare services due to ME then, as already by 2017 was that primary care should do the diagnosis. I don't remember when the rules changed (this is an issue because some pwME will get told by NAV/disability and welfare that their diagnosis from a GP is "not good enough" and to see a hospital doc, but the hospital denies access to such a doctor since "diagnosis was set according to official guidelines" already).

    I'd have to read the study to see how this was accounted for, but a bit too tired.
     
    Midnattsol, Jan 19, 2023
    #3
    Hutan, RedFox, hibiscuswahine and 4 others like this.

Share This Page