Thesis Hope for recovery after prolonged and unexplained fatigue, 2024, Andersen (Norwegian)

https://brage-inn-no.translate.goog...0/3170468?_x_tr_sl=no&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en

Summary
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalopathy (CFS/ME) is a complex and long-term illness of unknown cause. The core symptom is persistent fatigue that is not relieved by rest. Patients with CFS/ME face many challenges and need support, including symptom relief and coping techniques. Although there is no curative treatment, some individuals have experienced improvement.

The purpose of this study is to explore and understand the recovery process in CFS/ME patients by giving them a voice and identifying what they themselves experience as important for recovery. The question being explored is: How is the process experienced by patients with CFS/ME who have experienced recovery, and what do they believe has contributed to recovery?

The study conducted five semi-structured interviews with patients who had experienced improvement with CFS/ME. A qualitative design was chosen. The transcribed interviews were analyzed through systematic text condensation.

The findings show that recovery from CFS/ME is a complex and time-consuming process that requires a holistic approach. Relational support, lifestyle changes, and acceptance contribute to a sense of increased control over everyday life, and a balanced approach to both physical and mental health is essential. The study also shows that patients often experience emotional setbacks, but find strength in maintaining meaningful activities and positive relationships.

The results support recommendations for activity adjustment, cognitive therapy and graded exercise, as well as the need for regular follow-up through conversations and reflection groups. Patients are calling for better expertise in the healthcare system, and increased professional understanding can improve their experience of healthcare services.

Publisher
Inland Norway University

=======

 

On the basis of what is quoted I would rephrase

as, ‘the findings show whatever I want them to show’.

 

It is interesting to see openly displayed just how incompetent teaching of mental health is.

How can people like Peter Denton White and Michael Sharpe expect to be taken seriously if this is the reality of mental health training?

 

Am I the only one who finds the idea that patients have to be given a voice to be objectionable?

 

There is a place for such … (sorry word finding problems, perhaps I mean qualitative) … research, but this data has been tortured beyond any meaningful scientific validity to say what the student (and/or her supervisor) want it to say.

I could not see the name of the supervisor, but I wonder if they are part the ideological grouping in Norway linked to LP and promoting the concept of recovery from ME/CFS even though such recovered patients are very much a minority. Perhaps she could go on to interview people over six feet tall to establish how we can all grow taller.