Kid-edited journal pushes scientists for clear writing on complex topics

Discussion in 'Other research methodology topics' started by Andy, Jan 11, 2023.

  1. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    22,391
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    "The reviewer was not impressed with the paper written by Israeli brain researcher Idan Segev and a colleague from Switzerland.

    “Professor Idan,” she wrote to Segev. “I didn’t understand anything that you said.”

    Segev and co-author Felix Schürmann revised their paper on the Human Brain project, a massive effort seeking to channel all that we know about the mind into a vast computer model. But once again the reviewer sent it back. Still not clear enough. It took a third version to satisfy the reviewer.

    “Okay,” said the reviewer, an 11-year-old girl from New York named Abby. “Now I understand.”

    Such is the stringent editing process at the online science journal Frontiers for Young Minds, where top scientists, some of them Nobel Prize winners, submit papers on gene-editing, gravitational waves and other topics — to demanding reviewers ages 8 through 15."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/scie...1&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Nature+Briefing
     
    Tia, Louie41, MEMarge and 17 others like this.
  2. cassava7

    cassava7 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,021
    One can only wonder what a kid editor reading a FND paper from the likes of Stone, Carson, Perez or Edwards would say.
     
    Tia, Louie41, MEMarge and 9 others like this.

Share This Page