Medically Unexplained Symptoms and PEM (Paediatric Emergency Medicine) presentations - Dr Armstrong - 11 Jun 2020

Sly Saint

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
London School of Paediatrics - HEE NHS UK



(I skipped the case examples)
youtube generated transcript:
pt1
think about what is
mus or also known as PP so there are
multiple terms used to describe the same
issue the one that's most common used in
the UK is probably
medically unexplained symptoms it's also
known by some people as perplexing
presentations and in
creasing in the literature but more so
overseas in the UK it's known as bodily
distressed disorder and so these are all
interchangeable terms and sometimes
you'll heard of it referred to as a
functional disorder the most important
thing is there's no one pattern of
symptoms this can affect any organ
system or more than one organ system and
the hallmark of mus is that the symptoms
that an individual describes are not
fully explained by physical examination
or investigation what's really important
and something that occasion gets lost in
mus is that the symptoms the patient's
experiencing are absolutely 100% real to
them they are frequently distressing an
anxiety inducing both to them their
family and indeed the clinical team who
treats them because they committed why
the Chaves have no symptoms apologies
for the fire alarm in the background
hopefully I won't have to evacuate talk
um what is it not well it's absolutely
not malingering and that's very important to
understand and people sometimes get
labeled as faking their symptoms because
we can't explain them medically but
actually when you look at the literature
on these young people they are
absolutely not malingering it's not
exactly the same as fabricated or
induced illness but women come back and
talk about the overlap a little bit
later the talk in terms of the other
things that some that it used some
people may have heard of somatoform
disorders and it's a little bit pedantic
that if you're talking to mental health
colleagues this is distinct from em us
the difference between em us in
somatoform disorders is that in
somatoform disorders something is
physically wrong with you so for example
you have ankle pain and what happens is
the patient become psychologically
fixated on that real symptom to the
point where it becomes overwhelming so
it's an over-exaggeration of symptoms
due to psychological fixation for a real
condition as opposed to mus where there
isn't accurate information for symptoms
and organic illness well the distressing thing is that if
you look at the adult studies about four
to ten percent of adults with presumed
mus do eventually turn out to have an
organic diagnosis and I think that's the
other thing that's really important when
you're treating a possible mus you have
to keep in mind because some of them
will turn out eventually to have a rare
or unsuspected disorder which does
explain everything so what do we know
about mus

well we don't know very much
about mus in children young people
specifically there is quite a lot of
research in adults but not as much
that's been explicitly done only on a
pediatric population some so you suggest
up to ten percent of children will get
some medically unexplained symptoms at
some point in their childhood and that
sounds a lot but remember that a child
who has a nonspecific tummy pain which
is a well recognized common presentation
general Pediatrics could potentially
fall into the category of medically
unexplained symptoms in the literature
what you find is that most mus is
managed by self care approximately 30%
of adults with mus a suit primary care
support and in frontof draw acute mus is
managed in primary care body one percent
of adult patients with mus will seek
second to care support however this 1%
are often very frequent attenders of
second tear frequent users of services
and frequent requesters of tests and so
they come to people's attention it's
possible if it goes for this a slightly
higher on children but we don't have any
published evidence and supports this so
what happens to people with mus so as
you can see and although the majority of
people with mus and this is adults again
do recover within 12 months
I'm not insignificant percentage will
continue to have ongoing symptoms for
all the 12 months and that is higher air
in things like elegy than it is in most
fierceful at all we don't have the
figures for children but we know it is
possible for these children to go on
with long-term symptoms.

so what can you do to help for these young
people who you suspect may have mus well
the good news is there is some guidance
available and currently available is the
Royal College of Psychiatrists and experienced symptoms in children and
young people which is published in all
this 2018 and that is freely available
to Google and I've linked it at the end
of the talk in the resources slide at
the end of this presentation the Royal
College of pediatrics and child's health
has a new guideline which is due for
publication very soon I confirmed with
the college it is due out but I don't
have an actual date for publication at
this point in time but keep watching
this space there are some basic
principles when dealing with children
with possible mus the first thing is to
really think about it early so always
have in the back of your mind that
anyone presenting with unusual signs and
symptoms could mus be part of the
differential and it's important to be
open with children young people and
their families about the possibility of
mus as soon as you consider it and I
would list it in the normal list of
differentials and assuming I will be
explaining the possible medical
differentials and the reason for that is
the best way of managing these young
people is by parallel investigation
management strategies.

so it's not a case of we do all the medical things and then
we hand you over to psychiatry and walk
away we talk from the very beginning
about the importance of involving the
mental health teams in managing young
people with possible mus
so this talk is obviously specifically
around management and PGD is part of our
Penn week so probably the most important
thing is to recognize that you might be
dealing with a young person with MUS
and obviously D is different to the ward
and outpatients you get to see people
for a short period of time and it isn't
always apparent about early stage this
is kiram us but there are some things to
look out for so look out for frequent
attenders pre-competitive medical
presentations not so much with injuries
and another thing to account for is the
tense in multiple places what's
sometimes known as hospital shopping so
yes they've been to your department
three times but actually mum also
mentions that they've been to different
number two hospitals in the local area
and they've been seeing the GP and maybe
they've seen something outpatients at
another hospital and maybe they've seen
somebody privately but essentially a
pattern of people looking for an answer
when they can't find one because people
can't give them a straightforward answer
there's often quite significant mismatch
between the anxiety the child noon
person or their family and the medical
concerns so a lot of these symptoms are
not what we would consider red flag
symptoms they're ongoing and they're
chronic and they're annoying but they're
not normally immediately worrying but
that isn't always mirrored by the family
and often the reason that is by the time
you're seeing them in the emergency
department they may well have seen
several other people in several of the
places and being told there's nothing to
worry about but the symptoms are still
present and that leads on to the next
thing which is often you get to the end
of the consultation and you find there
is expressed or hidden dissatisfaction

so you'll experience the family that
everything's fine there's nothing to
worry about and the looks you're getting
clearly tell you that they're not happy
about it and what's important actually
that one is this explore with the family
why they're not happy about it and what
their concerns and expectations are from
a junior perspective these cases can be
quite complex and I think the most
important thing is if you think you're
seeing in running that might have any us
for these reasons or for some of the
things we've talked about and then it's
important to escalate early to a senior
doctor to discuss the best way of
managing them so things you can do in
the emergency department it's to be open
and non-judgmental as we talked about
it's really important to make it clear
that
mus is not malingering or fabricating it
is dealing with symptoms that we cannot
explain with a standard organic model
it's really important to acknowledge the
child in young person families distress
it's very tempting to say oh it's
nothing to worry about without actually
acknowledging that is disabling or
painful for the young person what you
can do is be reassuring about the
diagnosis you can exclude and one of the
phrases that I often use in the emergent
part is to be reassuring about we know
there's nothing immediately dangerous or
worrying and clearly there's something
that needs addressing but it doesn't
need to happen today and we don't need
to admit you to do it and really what
you're looking for is a pathway to
ongoing care that practically doesn't
involve admission or returning to the
emergency department so this is where
things like urgent review clinics if you
have access to them are really important
discussion with your inpatient
colleagues discussion with primary care
sometimes you do still need to provide a
safety net because members children will
end up having orgasms you can introduce
a holistic body mind link concept the
young person to do that things not to do
so really really importantly not to
minimize or ignore the symptoms they are
real to the patient also try not to over
investigate or admit if alternatives
exist these young people often have very
weird and wonderful symptoms and it is
tempting to assume that something really
serious is going on and just throw the
entire laboratory at them if not half of
radiology but actually all that's doing
is reinforcing that there is something
dangerous going on the we haven't
detected yet and that that's reinforced
by this concept of not focusing on
getting a specific specific diagnosis as
an alternative to MU S but actually
thinking of mus as being the diagnosis
and this is where having something
senior to have that conversation can be
helpful some of these young people will
end up getting admitted and the three
cases I've talked about all ended up
being admitted for different reasons
what's really important is as soon as
suspicion of mus for an inpatient then
you need an earlier senior review
preferably elite consultants and they
need to grow few things they need to
come up with a list of appropriate and
proportionate list of differentials
investigations and specialty referrals
and there is a fine balance to be struck
between not under investigating because
we don't want to miss something but also
not over investigating so a sensible
discussion that bit eginning about which
tests are appropriate and then if
they're all normal that actually we
don't need to do any more tests it's
really important that there is a lead
clinician who will oversee case
management and communication with
children young people in their families
because these cases by their definition
are difficult to explain what's
happening and if different people tell
the family different things that just
exacerbates the problem and you want to
link to your local cams or pediatric
liaison team and then probably led by
the senior you want a no discussion and
the first thing to actually explore what
they think is going on do they have any
theories about the symptoms that they
have any belief systems around a health
or ill health and - they have people in
the family who have experienced
something similar but different it's not
uncommon to discover for example in a
relatively early stage and some of these
medically unexplained symptoms that a
beloved relative has recently had a
significant diagnosis of a similar organ
system and it's really important to
introduce the concept of mus or P P at
an early stage if you think it's part of
the differential don't surprise families
with it at the end of a period of
investigation

introduce the concept of the mind-body link and set out a plan
with the children and young people about
what tests you're gonna do and actually
it's good to be clear at the outset that
you are doing these tests in the
expectation that the tests will be
normal what families don't like is where
the Toolman will do this tests and then
we tell all that's normal okay well
we're doing other tests oh that's normal
and all we're reinforcing is we don't
know what's going on actually it is a
positive thing we think this is mus we
are ruling out the other things and once
we've ruled them out we don't need to do
any more tests and early joint working
with cows and PLT is really helpful and
even if the family haven't yet bought
into the diagnosis of mu s and P P then
talking some about the importance of
managing the uncertainty in the symptoms
is an important part of engagement with
cans or PLT outpatients well it's all a
bit more relaxed it's the same as
inpatient care but there's less urgency
to manage it in a single consultation
it's still however important to induce
the possible of a diagnosis at the
beginning not at the end and where the
facilities exist then the best way of
managing these is joint clinical
consultations with somebody from PLT or
Cam's in the room with you and the
patient and joining together to manage
the patient and it just highlights the
joint nature of this condition the
investigation there's a question there
do you find that cans appear too happy
too involved so yes I find they are
often happens well my experience of
working with them is absolutely if I go
to them as a clinician I say I think
there's a really high likelihood this is
mus we're gonna do this test and this
test and if they're normal it's really
looking like mus then they will
definitely want to get involved they'd
rather not sooner rather than later so
that needs us onto cams and PLT so
they'd like to be involved early but
even before the presence of your mental
health colleagues you as pediatricians
can still explore some things with the
family and the Chan young person it's
really important to get a good
chronology of the child's symptoms and
to compare that with what was going on
when the child's life at the same time
and one of the phrases that I learned
from working with PLT colleagues was to
consider the entrances and the exits
into a young person's life who's come
who's left who they left at they moved school have
a loss to close friends as a grandparent
died as a parent spit-up has a new step
parent arrived as a new step sibling
arrived these are all big events in
children young people's lives and it's
really important to have them documented
my chronology alongside the symptoms
because that's what allows you to start
making links as to what might be
potentially leading as mus
 
Last edited:
pt2
think about stresses at home at school with friends


do you explore the possibility of


safeguarding concerns so there isn't an


intrinsic link with safeguarding mus but


there's an overlap some children who are


being abused will turn out to present


with mus because they can't vocalize


their concerns and so they present with


mus but not everybody is but it's


important to clarify and ask and ask


without the parents presence if at all


possible that are they are they say is anyone


hurting them doesn't have to be in


school area term it could be in school


it could be over the Internet


we still need to get documentary


evidence we've asked that and you can


use some screening tools as one called


arc ads which is a revised children


anxiety and depression scale and again I


put the link in the resources at the end


of this talk we talked about useful


scripts and this is taken from the RCP


psych guidance on managing mus and I'll


just let you read the screen for a


couple of minutes so this is about how


you introduce to a child young person


and their families the link between the


mind and body and the importance of


involving cams or PLT in the process


early on and not waiting until we've


exhausted all of the possibilities


before we get to this point other things


that I'd used with younger children and


then us can present from very young is


to talk them through the impact of their


emotions on their body and so for


example even some news young as seven or


eight will understand the concept that


if you're having the best there you can


think of and you stub your tool you


probably won't be bothered if you


stubbed your toe but if you're having a


really bad day and everything's gone


wrong and you stub your toe then it


will feel really miserable because it's


another really miserable thing that's


happened in a miserable day and actually


that's that's an approach that quite


young children can begin to grasp but


how our bodies experienced physical


symptoms is absolutely influenced by our


state of mind and it's just a way of


opening the people up to the concept of


the link between the mind and the body


so we said we talked about mus and FII


so fabricated and jus stillness is not


the same but there are some parallels


and sometimes there can be a little bit


of blurring between them n fi I


explicitly the care is that Ponce is the


person responsible for health seeking


behavior so in general fi is seen in


younger children whereas in mus


it's the individual themselves who's the


prom prime reason for seeking of health


and generally therefore they're a bit


older but it is true that young children


who were subject to fri can transition


to all the young children and people


with mus
so she's been brought up where


your mother is consistently reinforcing


this concept of you holding the sick


role from a very early age they're not


surprisingly just because you're the one


making decisions you probably are going


to default to the same mindset around


sick role that you might have had when


you were younger


just a reminder XII is not a single


thing there's a spectrum and the green


to red is sort of the risk to the child


from how the family approach fri this is


taken from daniel Glaser's FII handbook


which the royal college of pediatrics is


produced which is also in the resources


pack and so you started with the most


benign form of foi which is essentially


over anxious parents who are worried


about their child symptoms and will


consult


multiple people to try and work out


what's going on and will hospital shop


and there's clear parallels here between


this and what we're talking about with


in the u.s. in general this is amenable


to reassurance calm explanation and


careful managing and there's very little


risk to the young person in general or


the location children can end up over


investigated the next type type ii is a


bit more complex this is where parents


have fixed health beliefs around why


their child or young person is ill and


this can occur as a result of a


breakdown communication between


professionals or maybe due to


pre-existing health beliefs it might be


related to relatives or friends who have


similar issues and these are more


challenging for professionals because


the parents really hold


beliefs in the way that's not easily


open to challenge they are a set of


things beliefs in the same way as a set


of religious beliefs or political


beliefs and it's quite difficult


sometimes and again this can definitely


lead to a significant breakdown and


working relationships between parents


and carers and therefore hospital


shopping and reinvestigation at the


instigation of the parents these are a


bit more concerning and they often do


need a safeguarding input finally we get


to type 3 which is the most worrying


this is where the parents are actively


fabricating and falsifying signs and


this is what we would have originally


thought of as Munchausen's by proxy if


you go back 20 years and this is the


most worrying it it can absolutely lead


to harm to the child these are the


parents who give a baby salt or


administer insulin to their child or to


definitely hurt them you know I don't


know one child where the mother booked


them into Edie with a painful wrist and


then while they were waiting the scene


took him into the toilets wrapped his


hand in a towel and hit him with a


hammer to make sure that when he was


seen there was definitely something to


be managed so these are really worrying


and and then type four is sin a bit


different this is where so in type three


the parent does not have a recognised


mental diagnosis mental health diagnosis


but is acting for unclear reasons and in


tight for the parent is suffering from


explicit psychiatric illness normally


some form of psychosis where they have a


delusional belief which leads them to


harm the child these are actually


incredibly dangerous to children but not


because of active malice on the part the


parent the parent is ill and needs help


and but there are cases where parents


have sadly murdered their children as a


consequence of their absolute psychosis


and then again FII similar to talking


about the father



mus some of the children will turn out


to have a true organic illness and type


5 in F&I in Dinah Glaser's


classification was where actually the


parent was right there was something


wrong with the child and although they


were labeled as having health care


seeking behavior actually they were


currently advocating for their child's


needs so how does Isabel up with mus


well in Fri safeguarding is based around


either neglect when the care is not


meeting the child


person's medical needs and this is


really type 1 and type 2 where there's


either at overanxious or fixed health


beliefs and from a seagoing perspective


the parent is acting what they perceived


to be the child's best interests but


isn't necessarily acting what we will


receive the child's best interest when


you get to the physical abuse or non


accidental injury then that's the active


fabrication that's the type 3 in the


type 4 where you actually got active


harm happening the child your results of


the FII in mm UX it's much more complex


because clearly the locus sits with the


young person not their carer and we've


already talked about the fact that it's


the child young person who's


experiencing these very real symptoms


however it doesn't mean that there's no


rule for safeguarding then us so we can


still consider the possibility of


neglect


if the carer is not acting in the trail


during person's best interest so if they


are supporting the young person in


insisting on more tests or Hospital


shopping or not really engaging with the


mental health component then that can be


a recent thing about safeguarding um and


as we've said there is a link with abuse


as one cause of mus
.............


the majority get better often without us


being involved at all so children with


nonspecific double pain will often just


get better some cases won't fully


resolve but they'll reach a stage where


the young person can manage their


symptoms so they don't impair function


and and this might be talking about some


that IBS where you know they work a way


to live their life without it causing


them problems about 1% of people


presenting with them us will have


assistent symptoms this is young people


my adults where if you don't manage them


carefully they remain at risk of


reaction it card from their health


seeking behaviors and what's important


about this is that looking at these


patients can be a real challenge for all


the staff involved staff can feel


frustrated because this isn't making


sense to them and we like to fix things


as doctors and nurses and allied health


professionals so if it's not working for


us than weeks feel frustrated we can


feel inadequate or a sense of failure


for the exactly the same reasons and


actually back an often lead to anger


when you put those two things together


and particularly when people start to


talk about malingering and fabrication


and falsification and it's really


important you don't transfer these


feelings on to the young person or their


family and actually it's really


important to use opportunities like


MDT's to allow staff to talk about their


feelings safely and talk about their


sense of frustration and anger when


looking at these young people otherwise


it can come out in the consultations


with the Italian person and the guide


from the royal culture of psychiatry has


a really really helpful top tips from a


Chan young person families perspective


and that's what the next two slides are


so these are what families have said to


medical staff


don't make us finger


for being an inpatient and this is what


they're saying is it comes across be


honest from the outset talk about the


fact that mus is a differential and it


means that we do know what's wrong with


them so mu s doesn't mean we throw in


our hands or than God we don't know it


means this is how we look after children


who present with this sort of problem um


don't tell them the child is making it


up well it's all in the head I hope we


wouldn't use those terms these days but


it does cause problems when it's clearly


not just ill in their head their


experience is achill symptoms and we


talked about importance of the whole


chronology and the importance of the


parent family and their emotional state


talk to them about the fact their pain


is really real it's not that it's a


fabricated pain and don't um there's


nothing wrong with them and send them


home with a child in the worst physical


Ambition this is goes back to our


managing these children Edie we we


should try not to admit them but


sometimes you have to in all three cases


I presented ended up being admitted


because they'd reached a stage where the


family couldn't manage them at all


very clearly the importance of


communication and this is a particularly


a problem for bigger hospitals with


multiple specialities these patients if


you're not careful can get bounced from


specialty to speciality to speciality


and nobody's holding the reins and


that's why it's really important to have


a single overriding person in charge of


the case and as they said make sure one


doctor is in charge so any questions


happy to take them on chat or take them


orally if people want to unmute


so the next slide after this has got the


resources on it



these are challenging patients and I


think that's for the most important


things to take away from it one of the


things I would say is watch out for a


patient who you actively avoid be that


in the emergency department you know oh


I saw in the last two times I don't go


back and see them again


they're just painful they say the same


thing or with also you're doing


inpatient work the patient who literally


reorganizes the ward around so you might


always start in bed one but just so


happened this patients in bed one and so


instead you start at the other end and


work your way backwards because it's


just too painful to go and see this


patient and if you've got patients like


that who are making you feel frustrated


and acquits


annoyed then actually start thinking


about should we be pushing down the mus


pathway because that's a big link from


my perspective between those two things


so question about what are the


alternative missing so yes absolutely


review clinics are an option I think


which clinic depends on your local set


up and it's very difficult to be


didactic without knowing how your


individual unit focuses that's why an


early discussion with a senior is the


best way forward because they'll know


the best


local policies so in my hospital I would


get them into our urgent PD general


pediatric review clinic rather than


bringing them back to a needy with you


clinic because actually a needy really


isn't going to get them much further


forward what they're gonna need is


engagement with a general pediatrician


who can manage the case and organize


those appropriate and proportionate


investigations and referrals if need be


any other questions see from the numbers


that people are beginning to drift away


do you find that the majority usually


discuss something and so I would say the


minority disclose specific abuse or


trauma it's often it can be relatively


minor things and this is why the


importance of entrance and exits is is


really interesting so a different


patient that had an 8 year olds who got


persistent hiccups for new organic cause


and actually when you went back through


technology they've started the day after


she was told a beloved aunt was


emigrating now that's not something you


would expect an essay Trigger mus but


there was a very clear link and actually


when you were able to start talking


about missing her aunt and how she would


keep in touch and hiccups began to


resolve so it doesn't always have to be


abuse or trauma it's something that for


the child or young person is relevant to


them I talked about the factors often


the diagnosis it's really common that


you know somebody comes in with


recurrent chest pain air and you find


that there are you know a grandparent or


an animal has had recent heart attack


that's really common and there's a lot


of anxiety of course the problem is that


often the anxiety is multi-generational


so you may well find the parent is


anxious about they're their own parent


who's just out of heart attack and now


their child is complaining of chest pain


and not surprising the entire family is


just caught up in this big anxious whirl


so other questions what are your tips


for safety netting if there are already


red flag symptoms so the the RCP psych


guideline has a specific set of red flag


symptoms that definitely merit a


discussion with a senior I didn't go


them all on the slides because it would


have taken about another six slides but


I can definitely direct you look at that


and if you're getting red flag symptoms


and that should be discussed with your


senior about how you safety net them how


do we untangle that all the lack of


posture yeah so we don't know Corbin's


knew we wouldn't find out for a while I


think it goes back to the thing about


being open and honest and saying to the


young person this might be related to


coverage some post.

so chronic fatigue

syndrome has an overlap with MUS but is

not exactly the same and I think I would

look at how you look at the two

somebody's asked about ours conversation

family can be difficult for juniors and

the best way to deal with them.
so I go back to you need to talk to senior and
even out of hours you would have a
senior you can talk to and they should
help you with a script to talk to the
family um I think the important things
are it's reasonable to say do you know
what your symptoms are and not clearly
one thing or another and this is a few
of the things it might be and I'm going
to talk to my boss and think about what

we can best do in terms of helping you

get to the base of what is going on and


if you've had experience with mus then


it's perfectly reasonable to bring that


into the discussion I wouldn't do it for


the first time without understanding a


bit more about how it works and this is


definitely one to sit in with somebody


more senior when having that talk to


learn that the best ways of having that


conversation with family it's easy to


get it wrong and for the family to take


away the concept that you're telling


their child is making it up and you have


to be very careful in how you phrase


that the scripts that we that we put up


and the ones that are in the RCP psych


guidance are quite useful for that


anything else from anyone okay


now that's the resources page so that's


the medically unexplained symptoms in


children young people from the Royal


College of psychiatry


there's the fabricate induced illness by


carers from the rar cpc-h and the


archives which we reference the revised


children's anxiety and depression scale


is available online as well and that's


referenced in the Royal College of


Psychiatrists
guidance
 
Last edited:
"what's really important
and something that occasion gets lost in
mus is that the symptoms the patient's
experiencing are absolutely 100% real to
them they are frequently distressing an
anxiety inducing both to them their
family and indeed the clinical team who
treats them"

he seems to be treading on thin ice here. So, they are not real or need not be considered real by others. Whatever "real" may mean.
 
I read an account once of a young rheumatoid arthritis patient. She was a pre teen when her symptoms started. They seemed a bit vague at first and gradually worsened.

Naturally she was distressed. She was being left behind & felt left out me her friends and classmates as she couldn't keep up.

Then she was ambushed at an outpatient appointment by therapist who sat her down and asked why she didn't want to go to school, why she was struggling to make friends.

It was the ultimate betrayal for this kid.

The cruelty of being disbelieved and the problem made worse by the very people she thought would try to help her. The additional cruelty of being accused of not wanting to do the things she so desperately did want to do.

Eventually, the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis was made and an explanation for her symptoms became clear. There was never an acknowledgement of the harm the therapist or team caused.

I wish these people would assess how many people experience the same thing as this youngster.

I wish they would assess the long term damage caused by having faith that those who are supposed to help and support you will ripped away.
 
Why is there mention of PEM in the title when it is not discussed (as far as I can tell, too rambly to read all)? This is the exact same substance as any alternative medicine guru: null and void. I don't get it, it's entirely devoid of anything relevant to the actual needs. I would actually feel like I would be wasting my time less than this if my job were to watch actual clown shows all day.

Lot of waffling without substance. Just someone who likes to hear the sound of their voice "explaining" the "unexplained" spooky ghost sounds followed by thunder.
 
In this case, it seems 'PEM' abbreviates 'Paediatric Emergency Medicine'.
Also explains the bit about keeping the patient out of the emergency room in the future...
Hmmm. Still odd considering this very rarely presents to emergency, those kinds of symptoms are almost universally handled by GPs. Well, more like not handled but whatever this is where it doesn't happen.
 
If they were honest compassionate professionals they would openly acknowledge and apologise for these kind of mistakes, and learn from them. Without being asked or forced to.
How then could it be maintained, as is repeated ad nauseam as a mantra, that no harm come from conversion disorder? Which is of course deliberate, a full accounting of the outcomes would have all of it cancelled in a heartbeat. It's a scam, you can't maintain a scam and face the truth at the same time.

So everyone lies. Most probably unwittingly. But they are licensed professionals and they lie, to themselves, to us, about us and to the world. With Enron-style creative accounting of hiding the losses and amplifying gains that are mostly an illusion. Actually Enron was small-time fraud compared to this, and far less lethal.

But the circle jerk goes on spinning. How else would Freud spin in his grave if not turned by the cyclone of hot air coming from the spit of woo?
 
Back
Top Bottom