Protocol Neurobiological basis and risk factors of .. fatigue and concentration problems after COVID-19: ..prospective case–control study, 2023, Verveen et al

Discussion in 'Long Covid research' started by Sly Saint, Jul 1, 2023.

  1. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,636
    Location:
    UK
    Abstract
    Introduction The risk factors for persistent fatigue and cognitive complaints after infection with SARS-CoV-2 and the underlying pathophysiology are largely unknown. Both clinical factors and cognitive-behavioural factors have been suggested to play a role in the perpetuation of complaints. A neurobiological aetiology, such as neuroinflammation, could be the underlying pathophysiological mechanism for persisting complaints.

    To unravel factors associated with persisting complaints, VeCosCO will compare individuals with and without persistent fatigue and cognitive complaints >3 months after infection with SARS-CoV-2. The study consists of two work packages. The first work package aims to (1) investigate the relation between persisting complaints and neuropsychological functioning; (2) determine risk factors and at-risk phenotypes for the development of persistent fatigue and cognitive complaints, including the presence of postexertional malaise and (3) describe consequences of persistent complaints on quality of life, healthcare consumption and physical functioning. The second work package aims to (1) determine the presence of neuroinflammation with [18F]DPA-714 whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) scans in patients with persisting complaints and (2) explore the relationship between (neuro)inflammation and brain structure and functioning measured with MRI.

    https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/6/e072611

    Methods and analysis This is a prospective case–control study in participants with and without persistent fatigue and cognitive complaints, >3 months after laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants will be mainly included from existing COVID-19 cohorts in the Netherlands covering the full spectrum of COVID-19 acute disease severity. Primary outcomes are neuropsychological functioning, postexertional malaise, neuroinflammation measured using [18F]DPA-714 PET, and brain functioning and structure using (f)MRI.

    Ethics and dissemination Work package 1 (NL79575.018.21) and 2 (NL77033.029.21) were approved by the medical ethical review board of the Amsterdam University Medical Centers (The Netherlands). Informed consent is required prior to participation in the study. Results of this study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and shared with the key population.

    https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/6/e072611
     
    livinglighter, RedFox and EndME like this.
  2. EndME

    EndME Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,094
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2023
    livinglighter and RedFox like this.
  3. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,601
    Location:
    Australia
    Both clinical factors and cognitive-behavioural factors have been suggested to play a role in the perpetuation of complaints.

    Decades on and they are still stuck at the suggested/possible/promising phase.

    And gotta love the passive 'have been suggested' framing. Yeah, by people like you, Knoop. And it was stronger than merely suggested.

    They are using some decent objective measures, and acknowledge the existence of PEM, though how they measure that will be critical.
     
    Lou B Lou, RedFox, Trish and 2 others like this.
  4. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    53,646
    Location:
    UK
    Some quotes:



     
    RedFox, EndME and Sean like this.
  5. EndME

    EndME Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,094
    Overall Merel Hellemons makes a great impression on me. It's great to see that Hellemons was part of the recent evaluation of the Knoop CBT for Long-Covid trial https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/cid/ciad399/7210772.

    It's very dissapointing to see that the clinical collaborators of Rob Wüst, who himself has always made an excellent impression on me and repeatedly does so, van Vugt and Appelman are part of this disastrous CBT trial. I can only hope that this was due to them somehow being part of the general selection process of patients without having anything to do with the trial.
     
    RedFox and Trish like this.

Share This Page