Pleconaril and ribavirin in new-onset type 1 diabetes: a phase 2 randomized trial, 2023, Krogvold et al

Discussion in 'Other health news and research' started by Midnattsol, Oct 4, 2023.

  1. Midnattsol

    Midnattsol Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,679
    Abstract
    Previous studies showed a low-grade enterovirus infection in the pancreatic islets of patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes (T1D). In the Diabetes Virus Detection (DiViD) Intervention, a phase 2, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group, double-blind trial, 96 children and adolescents (aged 6–15 years) with new-onset T1D received antiviral treatment with pleconaril and ribavirin (n = 47) or placebo (n = 49) for 6 months, with the aim of preserving β cell function. The primary endpoint was the mean stimulated C-peptide area under the curve (AUC) 12 months after the initiation of treatment (less than 3 weeks after diagnosis) using a mixed linear model. The model used longitudinal log-transformed serum C-peptide AUCs at baseline, at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. The primary endpoint was met with the serum C-peptide AUC being higher in the pleconaril and ribavirin treatment group compared to the placebo group at 12 months (average marginal effect = 0.057 in the linear mixed model; 95% confidence interval = 0.004–0.11, P = 0.037). The treatment was well tolerated. The results show that antiviral treatment may preserve residual insulin production in children and adolescent with new-onset T1D. This provides a rationale for further evaluating antiviral strategies in the prevention and treatment of T1D. European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials identifier: 2015-003350-41.
     
  2. Midnattsol

    Midnattsol Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,679
    Peter Trewhitt likes this.
  3. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    14,087
    Location:
    London, UK
    I don't understand why they are reporting average marginal effect when a straight comparison of AUC values would seem to be more intelligible. I have no idea what the average marginal effect means and if the p value is 0.037 it is clearly not a very obvious effect.
     
    Peter Trewhitt, shak8 and FMMM1 like this.

Share This Page