Predictive Processing and the Pathophysiology of Functional Neurological Disorder, 2024, Jungilligens and Perez

Discussion in 'Other psychosomatic news and research' started by Andy, May 18, 2024.

  1. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    22,391
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Abstract

    The contemporary neuroscience understanding of the brain as an active inference organ supports that our conscious experiences, including sensorimotor perceptions, depend on the integration of probabilistic predictions with incoming sensory input across hierarchically organized levels.

    As in other systems, these complex processes are prone to error under certain circumstances, which may lead to alterations in their outcomes (i.e., variations in sensations and movements). Such variations are an important aspect of functional neurological disorder, a complex disorder at the interface of brain–mind–body interactions. Thus, predictive processing frameworks offer fundamental mechanistic insights into the pathophysiology of functional neurological disorder.

    In recent years, many of the aspects relevant to the neurobiology of functional neurological disorder – e.g., aberrant motor and sensory processes, symptom expectation, self-agency, and illness beliefs, as well as interoception, allostasis, and emotion – have been investigated through the lens of predictive processing frameworks.

    Here, we provide an overview of the current state of research on predictive processing and the pathophysiology of functional neurological disorder.

    Paywall, https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/7854_2024_473
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 18, 2024
    Deanne NZ and Peter Trewhitt like this.
  2. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,998
    Location:
    Canada
    This makes absolutely zero sense. It's nothing but an echo chamber "turtles all the way down" model that simply ignores real-life data.
     
    FMMM1, Sean, Deanne NZ and 5 others like this.
  3. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,526
    Arse over elbow
     
    FMMM1, Sean, alktipping and 2 others like this.
  4. ToneAl

    ToneAl Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    134
    Location:
    Adelaide Australia
    Hasn't this model proven to be fake but they still like to push it
     
    FMMM1, Peter Trewhitt and alktipping like this.
  5. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,601
    Location:
    Australia
    Never stopped them before. They simply reject reality and substitute their own self-serving version. And nobody is stopping them.
     
  6. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    14,082
    Location:
    London, UK
    As Voltaire and mark Twain said, common sense isn't that common.
     
  7. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,998
    Location:
    Canada
    Yeah and I didn't notice but Perez is an author, so basically one of the "big guns" of the ideology. They have a good scam and they're not letting go of it. It's an officially approved and enabled scam, they can simply coast on repeat.

    There is a common criticism of AI models not having any intelligence yet, as being merely "stochastic parrots". Which has some truth to it, but ignores the rapid pace of progress. Those parrots here don't even bother with stochasticity, they just repeat the same stuff in their echo chamber that they heard when they first entered it.

    Oh, and this appears to be a textbook, so presumably more parrots are being trained with it, even though it displays less intelligence than GPT3.5. Incredible.
     
    Sean and Peter Trewhitt like this.

Share This Page