Long COVID is nicely discussed by Burke and del Rio in a short article in Lancet Infectious Diseases .1 The UK is world leading in having two large, high-quality prevalence studies of COVID-19 in the ONS Infection Survey2 and REACT3 (but this advantage is thrown away when politicians ignore the findings). The ONS infection survey has strong design, and estimates 1.3% or 862 000 people with long COVID symptoms persisting for more than 12 weeks, including 0.26% or 177 000 reporting daily activities limited a lot, with 98 000 of these being first infected more than a year ago.2 REACT also found a high prevalence of persistent symptoms.3 This represents a large burden of disability for individuals, their supporters, and the economy, with GPs on the frontline. Yes, this is self-reported survey data, but the ONS measure of activity restriction is academically respectable.4 Focusing on activity restriction captures severity and impact, and sidesteps issues with symptom lists while long COVID remains poorly understood. Corroboration is required, and, with political will, these numbers could be cross-checked with routine data such as school and work absences in a matter of weeks. Open access, https://bjgp.org/content/72/715/70
