Trial Report Safety & feasibility randomized placebo...trial exploring electroencephalographic effective connectivity neurofeedback treatment for FM,2025,Adhia+

Discussion in ''Conditions related to ME/CFS' news and research' started by Dolphin, Jan 5, 2025.

  1. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,103
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-83776-8

    Abstract

    Fibromyalgia is a chronic pain condition contributing to significant disability worldwide. Neuroimaging studies identify abnormal effective connectivity between cortical areas responsible for descending pain modulation (pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, pgACC) and sensory components of pain experience (primary somatosensory cortex, S1).

    Neurofeedback, a brain-computer interface technique, can normalise dysfunctional brain activity, thereby improving pain and function.

    This study evaluates the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel electroencephalography-based neurofeedback training, targeting effective alpha-band connectivity from the pgACC to S1 and exploring its effect on pain and function.

    Participants with fibromyalgia (N = 30; 15 = active, 15 = placebo) received 12 sessions of neurofeedback.

    Feasibility and outcome measures of pain (Brief Pain Inventory) and function (Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire) were collected at baseline and immediately, ten-days, and one-month post-intervention.

    Descriptive statistics demonstrate effective connectivity neurofeedback training is feasible (recruitment rate: 6 participants per-month, mean adherence: 80.5%, dropout rate: 20%), safe (no adverse events) and highly acceptable (average 8.0/10) treatment approach for fibromyalgia.

    Active and placebo groups were comparable in their decrease in pain and functional impact.

    Future fully powered clinical trial is warranted to test the efficacy of the effective connectivity neurofeedback training in people with fibromyalgia with versus without chronic fatigue.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 6, 2025
    Peter Trewhitt and Utsikt like this.
  2. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    347
    Location:
    Norway
    No, future trails are not warranted if the treatment was ineffective!
     
    shak8, Peter Trewhitt and Trish like this.
  3. Snow Leopard

    Snow Leopard Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,980
    Location:
    Australia
    Pilot studies can't really be used to judge efficacy, but I can tell from the outset this intervention won't work because it's based on a deeply misguided understanding of FM.
     
    Peter Trewhitt and Sean like this.
  4. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    347
    Location:
    Norway
    If there is no effect in a pilot, there’s no reason to do a larger trial. The bias of smaller trials will usually lead to an artificially larger and positive effect. It’s highly unlikely to get a false negative.
     
    Peter Trewhitt likes this.

Share This Page