Snakes and ladders: ME/CFS edition

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS discussion' started by Haveyoutriedyoga, Oct 23, 2024 at 8:59 PM.

  1. Haveyoutriedyoga

    Haveyoutriedyoga Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    684
    Location:
    South West, UK
    How about a ME/CFS Snakes and Ladders forum game?

    A post could add either

    • A “Ladder” (a victory or positive experience)

    • A “Snake” (a setback or struggle)

    • A “Bonus space” (special power-ups, curveballs, or penalty spaces)

    Examples

    Snakes: Tried to push through a flare-up and now you’re wiped out for a week – back 6 spaces

    Ladders: Doctor finally added the word “Syndrome” to “Chronic fatigue” in your latest referral letter. Move ahead 1 spaces.

    Bonus Spaces - curveballs, power-ups, or penalties: Someone suggested you try yoga – lose a turn.

    For scale, we could imagine the board has 100 spaces. We have two 6-sided dice.
     
    Evergreen, Sean, forestglip and 5 others like this.
  2. MrMagoo

    MrMagoo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,123
    I’d like to see it as an app or online game. Where people get little criticisms of what they’re doing (why did you throw a 5? You should have thrown a different number!) bubbling up the side.
     
    Sean, Peter Trewhitt, bobbler and 3 others like this.
  3. Wonko

    Wonko Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,819
    Location:
    UK
    Surely the dice must have i sides?
     
  4. Peter Trewhitt

    Peter Trewhitt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,036
    Presumably all players need to have CBT before each throw of the dice to ensure they achieve the desired score.
     
    Evergreen, Haveyoutriedyoga and shak8 like this.
  5. Haveyoutriedyoga

    Haveyoutriedyoga Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    684
    Location:
    South West, UK
    Changing the very rules of the game, I love it!
     
    Peter Trewhitt and Sean like this.
  6. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,944
    Location:
    Australia
    Nah. All that business of testable predictions is just too much trouble, and the data might still say something you don't want it to. Why go to all that bother and risk when cooking the books can be done post-hoc. It's the enlightened methodology for the 21st century.
     
    rvallee, shak8, bobbler and 2 others like this.

Share This Page