Review The association between body image and psychological outcomes in multiple sclerosis. A systematic review 2024 Eccles et al

Discussion in 'Other psychosomatic news and research' started by Andy, Dec 27, 2024.

  1. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    23,401
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Highlights

    • Body image is an important psychological construct for people with MS.
    • Positive body image is associated with increased psychological wellbeing.
    • Body image could be a target for psychological intervention in MS.
    • Further research is needed to explore reported associations in more detail.

    Abstract


    Background

    Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating autoimmune condition, in which body image may be altered due to a range of biopsychosocial factors. The aim of this review was to examine whether there is a relationship between body image and psychological outcomes in MS, in order to guide clinical intervention development.

    Methods

    PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL and Scopus databases were searched systematically in November 2023 for eligible studies, using terms relating to MS and body image. Quantitative studies, published in English, that examined the relationship between body image and psychological outcomes in adults with MS were included. The QualSyst tool was used to assess risk of bias across studies. Screening and quality appraisal was verified by the third author. A narrative synthesis was used to report patterns in findings.

    Results
    Thirteen studies (ten cross-sectional and three intervention studies) met inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. The sample size across all included studies totalled 1533. The results suggested that positive body image was associated with improved mood, lower anxiety, increased self-esteem, and better quality of life. However, the causal nature of these relationships was unclear.

    Conclusion
    The findings offer preliminary evidence to suggest that a more negative body image is associated with higher levels of psychological distress in MS, indicating that body image may be a target for intervention. Further research is necessary to provide a greater understanding of this association, and to inform future clinical practice.

    Open access, https://www.msard-journal.com/article/S2211-0348(24)00802-2/fulltext
     
    Sean and Peter Trewhitt like this.
  2. Peter Trewhitt

    Peter Trewhitt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,488
    Despite admitting association does not mean causality, the abstract goes on to postulate not only causality but also a direction of causality.

    Also there is an implicit assumption that a more negative body image is indicative of less insight, however can we assert that the subjects did not have realistic body images.

    After 30 years of ME I have a more negative body image than I did pre-morbidly, but I believe that is a realistic assessment of thirty years of ill health and aging.

    [added - final sentence]
     
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2024
    Utsikt, shak8, oldtimer and 8 others like this.
  3. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,510
    Location:
    Australia
    Yes, there needs to be a distinction drawn between unrealistic and realistic views of our bodies.

    I don't dislike my body, as such. Apart from being a few kilos overweight and ageing it had never been a general issue for me in that sense. For example, I am well on my way to normal male-pattern baldness, and age related greying. But that has never worried me at all. Just normal, far as I am concerned.

    The only issue I have with it is that ME/CFS stopped it working properly, and started it hurting a lot. If I could get rid of that it would be okay.
     
    Last edited: Dec 29, 2024
    Utsikt, shak8, Yann04 and 5 others like this.
  4. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    15,461
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    Blah blah blah honestly these so called papers are just cut and paste jobs people with chronic illness x have x symptoms which are “associated with” x impact on quality of life. Adds nothing to human knowledge.

    if only the money spent on churning out these repetitive “papers” was spent on actually improving the situation of chronically ill people instead.
     
    Utsikt, shak8, Yann04 and 7 others like this.

Share This Page