Background: The long coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome includes a group of patients who, after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exhibit lingering mild-to-moderate symptoms and develop medical complications that can have lasting health problems. Objective: The purpose of this report was to examine the current body of evidence that deals with the relationship of COVID-19 infection with the long COVID syndrome to define the possible immunologic mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of long COVID and to describe potential strategies for the diagnosis and clinical management of the condition. Methods: Extensive research was conducted in medical literature data bases by applying terms such as long COVID, post‐COVID-19 condition, pathogenesis of long COVID, management of the long COVID syndrome. Results: The post-COVID conditions, a more recent and less anxiety-inducing term for the patient than long COVID or “long haul,” is an umbrella term for a wide range of physical and mental health symptoms similar to those seen in patients with the myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), experienced by some patients and are present ≥ 4 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although the precise reason why long COVID develops is unknown, one of the major causes is thought to be related to chronic inflammation with overproduction of inflammatory cytokines responsible for the symptoms of the disorder. Conclusion: Long COVID is a growing burden for millions of patients, health-care providers, and global health-care systems, and is a particular challenge for the allergist/immunologist. Many survivors of COVID-19 struggle with multiple symptoms, increased disability, reduced function, and poor quality of life. The allergist/immunologist can assist the total health-care team's efforts in providing a comprehensive and coordinated approach to the management of these patients by promoting comprehensive vaccination and rehabilitation and social services that focus on improving physical, mental, and social well-being, and by establishing partnerships with specialists and other health-care professionals who can provide behavioral, lifestyle, and integrative approaches that may have much to offer in helping patients cope with their symptoms. Open access, https://www.ingentaconnect.com/cont...rt00007;jsessionid=9jtmpf5nd9m9u.x-ic-live-03
Where they do even come up with this stuff? And how does this impertinent comment have its place in the abstract of an academic paper? So, nothing useful, let alone expert. Just give up before even trying, have nothing better than what the patient community figured out in the first few months. Basically just get shoved between departments that don't speak to one another, don't coordinate anything or even share information. It's as if the entire profession has lost the ability to think that there is still work to be done. Aim low, fail to deliver even that.
