Why we shouldn’t take peer review as the ‘gold standard’ - Washington Post. August 1 2019

Discussion in 'Research methodology news and research' started by ME/CFS Skeptic, Aug 17, 2019.

  1. ME/CFS Skeptic

    ME/CFS Skeptic Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,002
    Location:
    Belgium
    Last edited: Aug 17, 2019
    andypants, Simbindi, MEMarge and 21 others like this.
  2. Tom Kindlon

    Tom Kindlon Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,254
  3. Kalliope

    Kalliope Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,570
    Location:
    Norway
  4. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    15,175
    Location:
    London, UK
    Maybe Trevor Butterworth is strongly aligned with the pro-GMO movement and wants to use the argument that the author is aligned to anti-GMO to dismiss the Post he disagrees with?
     
  5. Mithriel

    Mithriel Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,816
    This was a big complaint among the physics community years ago. I do not know if it was ever resolved. They said that new theories were being stifled because they were dismissed by peer reviewers with a vested interest in the old theories.
     

Share This Page