Never debate them live, and especially verbally. They are masters of misdirection and obfuscation and smear, and will walk all over you.
The format should be written, with adequate time allowed between responses, and hosted/mediated by a genuinely independent third party.
Wessely is an el primo bullshitter, and a genius at spotting and exploiting the weaknesses in power structures and accountability mechanisms.
It is extraordinary how far he has got on so little, and how many otherwise intelligent people have been sucked in. :(
There is also a question as to the accuracy of diagnosis of mental health problems in adolescents (and adults) with regard to gender bias.
FTFY. :thumbsup:
Once again:
"in the later stages of treatment patients are encouraged to increase their activity (which must ultimately be the aim of any treatment)"
Wessely, David, Butler, & Chalder.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2107860
Surviving, most likely.
As long as they are not being hypocrites or arse holes about it, then I don't particularlyt blame individual docs with ME keeping their head down. They don't exactly have much power to stop the madness, and they know full well what the attitude of their colleagues is...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.