Is this official NHS policy now, not offering TPN for fear of infection, even if it means death of a patient?
Because the reasoning seems exactly the same as in Maeve’s case.
I just don’t get it, the way this government speaks about the disabled and announces cut after cut for the disabled. The way they speak you would think people are unwilling to work.
When in fact a lot of disabled are working or would want to work, but can’t.
This coupled with the unwillingness...
I wonder if it could also be the body requiring potassium, and potatoes are a good source for potassium.
Edit; (also) and I do also have the salt craving
Well, I agree about the groupthink. I am just disappointed that journalism is entertaining this so much these days.
To me good journalism is 1) gathering facts/research/ information and write an article on the facts found.
Less and less of that.
The void exists for a reason imho; to keep the BPS train going. Because how can you rehabilitate patients that not only cannot exercise (because bedbound) but are also (almost) unable to communicate.
So exclude the severe, even the moderate and only treat the mild and include people who do not...
I remember reading an article that pharmaceutical companies sometimes try to find new applications for certain medications.
I wonder if this is what is happening here.
They want to make it free for 60 plus but it costs too much in the Netherlands. So it costs about E400. I feel at risk because a relative of mine has a bad case of it.
Such a wrong way to save money. It only leads to more healthcare needed. And people suffering sadly.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.