Search results

  1. Cheshire

    Watt from MRC defends PACE in letter to Times

    You can read here part of the pages dedicated to the PACE trial (from p132 to 140, p 138 is missing)...
  2. Cheshire

    Simon Wessely: ‘ECT is in my own advance directive’

    Stop making these simplistic assumptions then. Can't you see you're hurting people while implying depression is just about thinking too much about your problem, hence it's all due to the sufferer's own weakness? Depression is a complex and life destroying condition, you're making a joke of all...
  3. Cheshire

    The cumulative effect of reporting and citation biases on the apparent efficacy of treatments: the case of depression (2018) de Vries et al.

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/71D73CADE32C0D3D996DABEA3FCDBF57/S0033291718001873a.pdf/cumulative_effect_of_reporting_and_citation_biases_on_the_apparent_efficacy_of_treatments_the_case_of_depression.pdf
  4. Cheshire

    David Tuller: Trial By Error: An Open Letter to The Lancet, Two Years On

    Trial By Error: Yet Another Appeal to The Lancet, With More On Board http://www.virology.ws/2018/07/10/trial-by-error-yet-another-appeal-to-the-lancet-with-more-on-board/
  5. Cheshire

    Swedish Central Ethics Review Board finds Macchiarini guilty of misconduct, requests retraction of 6

    If you tagg after editing, I think it doesn't work, so tagging @dave30th another time just in case.
  6. Cheshire

    Swedish Central Ethics Review Board finds Macchiarini guilty of misconduct, requests retraction of 6

    Hum, so do we have to wait for QMUL and the other academic centers to ask for retraction?
  7. Cheshire

    Resistance To Science and Technology by Julian Vigo (Forbes.com)

    Open Letter from Solve ME/CFS Initiative President and CEO to Forbes Magazine https://solvecfs.org/open-letter-from-solve-me-cfs-initiative-president-and-ceo-to-forbes-magazine/
  8. Cheshire

    David Tuller: Trial By Error: Professor Sharpe’s Pre-Hearing Briefing for Monaghan

    OMG, this is an exercise in bad faith, nearly all their statements are contentious (going from half truths to blatant lies "There was no ‘outcome-switching’.") This remark is particularly laughable:
  9. Cheshire

    Resistance To Science and Technology by Julian Vigo (Forbes.com)

    That's what I implied, it's a very ambiguous statement where Sharpe said he was representing the opinion of the average doctor, while remaining the good doctor not saying it. But at the same time, he is still propagating this view, exactly like Wessely saying that "nobody likes these patients".
  10. Cheshire

    Resistance To Science and Technology by Julian Vigo (Forbes.com)

    Similar line to Sharpe's "undeserving sicks"
  11. Cheshire

    Member comments wanted: Second section (Who the guideline is for) of the NICE ME/CFS guidelines draft scope

    Are there desagreements or ambiguity about the diagnosis of RA? (genuine question)
  12. Cheshire

    We need new kinds of antidepressants, in addition to pills

    The problem is IMO that "depression" in itself doesn't mean anything. It's a symptom, not a disorder per se and probably due to many different things. But the most common attitude I've seen so far from many people talking about it is that they are convinced that their pet theory for what causes...
  13. Cheshire

    Video: The PACE trial: a short explanation, Graham McPhee

    What are you talking about? Michael Sharpe had great, great teachers, the best. (How dare you?)
  14. Cheshire

    Video: The PACE trial: a short explanation, Graham McPhee

    Thanks @Graham As usual, very clear. "Yet we are told that this study is of top quality. Let's be honest, this is not a matter of opinion or a question of interpretation. It is wrong. Black and white. Clearly, scientific analysis and statistical techniques are skills that the supporters of CBT...
Back
Top Bottom