Search results

This article basically seems to say there's no practical difference between MDs and DOs today except where they tend to work and some techniques DOs learn that most don't end up using.

Post-COVID-19 Condition in Track and Field Master Athletes: Severity, Symptoms, and Associations With Quality of Life and C-Reactive Protein Levels Boyi Zhang, Marijke Grau, Christian Puta, Daniel Arvidsson, Michael Arz, Jonas Böcker, Philip Chilibeck, Scott C. Forbes, Claudia Kaiser-Stolz...

The description of Becca in the teaser sounds really severe. She was transported from the clinic in a stretcher, and she hasn't left her bed in 644 days after that. She had to have the last tiny light on a CO detector covered to be in total darkness.

Even if it's not common, there are people that have recovered from years of ME/CFS, probably including some pretty severe cases. So they could answer this question of how their physical rehabilitation went. I suspect most people could just start moving around and be fine, as long as they don't...

Oh, the title was one of my favorite parts because I thought it was being said ironically. Like I think that is an amazing title if the implied end is "sometimes only destroys your life little by little, takes everything from you, and maybe then kills you eventually anyway." I imagine it being a...

Profiles of Individuals With Long COVID Reporting Persistent Cognitive Complaints Carmen Cabello Fernandez, Vincent Didone, Hichem Slama, Gilles Dupuis, Patrick Fery, Gaël Delrue, Alexia Lesoinne, Fabienne Collette, Sylvie Willems [Line breaks added] Objective A subset of COVID-19 patients...

Health Rising: 'TREATME: the Open Medicine Foundation’s Mammoth ME/CFS and Long COVID Treatment Survey Results'

Some of the message might be getting lost in the translation, but this part seems to say they were the ones that misinterpreted the NICE guidelines, not that their paper was misinterpreted. So pretty close to "we were wrong": Though this from the last paragraph seems to be written the other...

I'm surprised their response is actually "we were wrong". Not something I come across often in authors' replies. Edit: To clarify, they didn't actually say the words "we were wrong", but it sums up their response.

Beneficial effects of intermittent intravenous saline infusion in dysautonomic patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: a caseseries Per Sjogren, Helena Huhmar, Bo Christer Bertilson, Björn A Bragée, Olli Polo [Line breaks added] Purpose Myalgic...

I agree. From the trailer, it looks like a talented film-maker as well. This quote hit me like a train: Edit: fixed typo

What Doesn't Kill You Lives in the grip of ME/CFS ✓ Coming in 2025 ✓ 100% of profit reinvested in ME/CFS research and education "What Doesn't Kill You" is a forthcoming documentary exploring the lives of people battling ME/CFS, a scandalously underfunded and chronically ignored disease...

While IgG4 did go down more in responders, that's probably because it was four times higher at baseline in responders than non-responders. So maybe high baseline IgG4, like high NK cells, might be an indicator of who will respond. Table 2:

I read this and it was really helpful. I started Janeway's after, and that first book made it much easier and less intimidating to digest Janeway's. Though I paused Janeway's after they started talking about biochemistry concepts I had no clue about, so now I'm taking a detour on more basic bio...

Multifaceted evolution focused on maximal exploitation of domain knowledge for the consensus inference of Gene Regulatory Networks Adrián Segura-Ortiz, Karen Giménez-Orenga, José García-Nieto, Elisa Oltra, José F. Aldana-Montes [Line breaks added] Highlights • BIO-INSIGHT optimizes GRN...

Affective and chronic fatigue symptoms are associated with serum neuronal damage markers in Parkinson’s disease Hussein Kadhem Al-Hakeim, Hayder Naji Khudhair, Sayed-Omid Ranaei-Siadat, Fataneh Fatemi, Fateme Mirzajani , Mengqi Niu & Michael Maes [Line breaks added] Abstract Parkinson’s...

I put the results section from the preprint and the final paper in a diff checker (left hand side is preprint): https://www.diffchecker.com/lt6Xaxmg/ They didn't add anything there that makes it clearer that the chart is basically meaningless.

Probably, but I can only definitely say that's the case (really bad PEM plus sore throat and runny nose) for the time it happened a few days ago. I didn't think to track it in detail previously.

Yes, four patients were added later: