Search results

Doctors' unions wanted the public to support them when they went on strike, citing patient safety. It would be nice to think that they might speak out in return now.

They are in the land of pure imagination here, pure fantasy.

Where do you even start addressing this hogwash.

Ref 16 is https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-laryngology-and-otology/article/abs/effect-of-coronavirus-disease-2019-on-the-hearing-system/17853CF0327CD3181FF8A8121C8CB75C Ref 17 is https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070922000552?via%3Dihub Ref 53 is...

Absolutely - and also that if someone is experiencing a significant loss of cognitive function compared to how they were before getting ill, it's meaningless to tell them that they are 'objectively' unimpaired because their results are now 'average'.

Though they also say:

Absolutely, I'm quite sure there will be useful info and it's a good idea to collect it! Just a note of caution about what we think of as 'normal'. (having originally posted my earlier comment in the thread about 'normal effects of exertion'.)

From that Guardian article:

When the psychologisers say you're imagining that you have Long Covid because you were traumatised by lockdown, and you explain that you weren't, they do a 180-degree turn and say aha: you loved lockdown and you were traumatised by the idea of returning to normality! There's always a...

We do need to be a bit careful about how much the conclusions from studies on young male athletes in sports science departments can be applied to the population in general.

Important point, and it's something the 'fatigue clinics' don't get at all when they tell people to do 'activity planners' - you can't just allocate a certain amount of effort to a particular activity, because it will take more out of you when you've been overstretched in other ways.

It is no accident that the media are platforming this ridiculous opinion at a time when the government is looking for justifications to cut not only disability support but special needs provision in schools.

Picks out the few bits of evidence that sound as if they support her view (if you don't look at the quality of the evidence). Exaggerates and misrepresents the implications of those bits. Completely ignores the much greater quantity of evidence that shows her view to be incorrect. Presents the...

Five years in and we're still getting these "up to two years" headlines. (Not the researchers' fault.)

but also Reconsider the intervention if there is worsening, but the baseline assessment ensures there won't be any worsening. Because who needs joined-up thinking when you've got box-ticking.

They actually call it "Armchair Expert" :rofl:

Thank you - I was bending my brain trying to understand the significance of that figure!

A lot of verbiage that doesn't address the question about the closure of services.

"The studies will continue until morale improves."