You must be lucky enough to get invites from like minded people and share mutual interest conversations rather than the duty bound summonsing to childrens birthday parties and someones boring wedding, stuck on a table with people you have been deliberately trying to avoid for years.
I have to...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you in court. You have the right to talk to a lawyer for advice before we ask you any questions. You have the right to have a lawyer with you during questioning. If you cannot...
On the other hand unless you use objective information in studies its not acceptable to just say, "we couldn't get the objective info so we used subjective information".
Can you imagine if all parents had to do to insure their kids went to school whilst they were out at work was say, "did you...
Yes I noticed that. What I meant by external appointment in inverted commas was the potential that certain people maybe did some influencing in the back scratching circles.
Tovey out and a psychiatrist in is a scenario that could well suit those certain people.
Go to a restaurant that serves them in the soup. Usually you have to ask the waiter for them separately. It kind of spoils the joke but preserves the restaurants reputation.
This is bad both ways because they will just say that people with autism are obviously mentally ill so "CSS" symptoms aren't real. It also give them licence to ignore any of those biological issues that people with autism do get and then they'll be able to also downgrade the CSS thing to...
I think having a deference to presumed authorities like the BBC CNN FOX Cochrane the Lancet the BMJ etc whilst falling into the trap of claiming self appointed authorities should regulate other content and make pronouncements of fake news upon such other forums in blanket fashions is a...
The SMC is policed and controlled isnt it? So is Cochrane. How about the BBC, CNN Fox and Sky. You are falling into the appeal to authority fallacy in your logic it appears.
How about Reuters does that provide false news as much as anywhere else or not? Or does it get a pass as being...
So what should happen to people who say, "there’s always a tiny risk of serious complications with vaccines of course"? Should they be reported to the authorities?
Do people have the right to know if they or their children are potentially in that risk group and should medical science work on...
Just because it may carry accurate information it doesn't mean its no less capable of being an echo chamber than the rest of the internet.
If a blanket claim can be made for social media or other parts of the internet being an echo chamber it can be equally made for wiki.
Heres more from wiki...
Lets let wiki settle this. What does wiki say about itself?
Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. Biographies of living...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.