Search results

I wouldn't be surprised if I saw that verbatim as an abstract.

This program has no chance of succeeding it takes four days to do what LP can do in three.

Basically the outcome of the review is that people have the right to a say in their care and police should stop locking up black people in jail for suffering from schizophrenia. Did this really need expert review? Nothing will change except Wessely will receive more notoriety and probably...

I think its likely she did the review for herself and others in order to give prominence and legitimacy to the current bogus treatments rather than her motive being to volunteer to do it for Cochrane as an act of decency. Even if she just volunteered then failed to see the issues with the...

It seems a bit bizarre how Cochrane are going about this. If they are saying CBT and GET have no proven efficacy and are potentially even harmful so we want a review that reflects that, why would they keep giving Larun a chance to come back and do the review properly? Is that what they are...

Ye and she will have that bag under the table at the NICE review ready to hand out some ready made delights.

I guess the retraction happens tomorrow then with a scathing statement from Tovey?

Thirty days have September, April, June and November.....

Well he is a scientism fundamentalist.

Why don't they do it then by making observations instead of making models and throwing out the observation if it doesn't match their model.

Its not limited when language culture and "particular circumstances" mean only certain high priests can claim understanding of the big questions and make unfalsifiable pronouncements based on favoured hypothesis then call them theories. That's the whole point. No.

Surely its an oxymoron to have a belief in Richard Dawkins?

Only the interests they have declared? Just saying, "we consider we can manage the interests", does not declare exactly how they will do so. This needs to be laid out transparently with the full mechanics documented before the process. They have just declared they can do that so lets see them...

Notice I didn't use a question mark. Q: Very odd comment from EG......what's that all about? A: EG.

EG.

The other way to go about it is to get qualified then just fake the studies for decades.

Her name is now in the hat to be the next PM.

I have posted this previously on the forum.

Somebody send him the PACE study.

This is just nonsense, one cant comment in the media or on social media about the issues under review but they can make a living out of the issues under review, obtain study grants to promote the current guidelines and continue to sell books that support the narrative of the things under review...