Search results

The mans a genius, first he let you collect a record of his inability to justify himself scientifically, THEN he blocked you.

Can I suggest you read the paper. Oh wait that doesn't work on you!! As you have studied the paper in depth you should know!

I think finally after all these years of not being listened to about how bad the BPS crowd is Sharpe is doing more for us than we could ever do. If policy makers and other docs don't wake up in abundance it will be amazing. Having said all that it still could takes years of bureaucracy and...

The only thing that has reinforced the idea that CBT and GET are useful for ME is the SMC by promoting a trial that didn't stick to its protocol, recovery and improvement definitions. The actual data from PACE proved that if you cook the books halfway through a trial you can claim success from...

He is basically trying to say that ME is a subjective condition with no objective markers so they did a subjective study of treatments. Except they had objective measures of improvement to measure but decided not to and changed the protocol halfway through the non controlled study and changed...

Yes that really makes me laugh when he claims it was a controlled study, I am pretty sure he thinks that means, "we controlled the study really well." That usually satisfies an ill informed person who doesn't understand that to be a controlled study there has to be a control group.

I suppose just telling everyone to read the paper, refusing to show data and running off to the SMC to spin out garbage, is considered dialogue. They have refused to engage in reasonable dialogue for thirty years and only last week for 3 hours did it really get addressed in parliament. He has...

Isn't that unbecoming or is it the inclusion of the pompous part that's unbecoming. Or is wankery unbecoming on its own, pardon the pun. Or is it the combination of the two that's unbecoming? Maybe just being pompous is unbecoming or maybe its a crucial part of becoming wankery. Who knows, the...

That subset are not being harassed they are being held to account scientifically whilst they continue to live in denial and hide data.

Wow!

I reckon i could do it I am stupid enough.

No you are not, but you are doing a fabulous job taking him to task. Well done!! Maybe remind him how they also dropped many of the objective measures.

FOR GODS SAKE MAN READ THE PAPER!!

No. I think everyone except him knows that. Also they had mid trial literature claiming the favoured treatments had certain efficacy.

Hilarious, he is only challenging the uncontrolled bit. LOL Also he just switched from "read the paper", to "you should know better as you have read the paper". The man should be doing the Edinburgh festival as a comic.

I am sure he will let you off that one, its just all that other unbecoming online stuff that may add up against you. :sneaky:

I have stated on numerous occasions over the years since PACE and Peter Whites statement..... http://www.investinme.org/Article427 Initial response by Hooper to undated letter by White to Horton.htm .....that this would be their fall back position and they have done this by using the oxford...

Do we have to refer to him as the Scottish Psychiatrist from now on or forever bring a curse upon ourselves, is it because of unbecoming behaviour?

Ye, "I am going to insult you in a private correspondence but you are not allowed to tell anyone".

Personally I think Rickey Gervais is the last of our worries and I don't want to see a twitter storm that brings in the whole world to turn it all into an even bigger joke and sidetracks the amazing work that was done yesterday. A Twitter storm could take this off to a whole other direction...