Search results

He's probably putting his foot in his mouth to sooth his own gunshot wound.

I really doubt he can show us a dubious biological study on ME that has shaped healthcare, treatment and disability benefit policy for the last 3 decades? Which one has lead to the NICE guidelines etc?

Sharpe is a bit confused here isnt he? He should have blocked himself, he's the one shooting himself in the foot. He just cant help himself can he, he will be calling Kim Jon Un a short fat man on Twitter at 3 o'clock in the morning soon.

Why would anyone issue a FOI request to a study like rituximub for example? They meticulously went stage by stage on their study then just admitted there was no positive outcome on conclusion unlike the BPS crowd who have financially gained with pseudoscience and propaganda for 3 decades. Also...

What's the f in there for?

Fair enough but are there doctors and researchers trolling through members forums on the internet etc to find out if individual people mostly not using their own name have accused a doctor of lying so that they can then go away and judge that whole patient population harshly? In Michael...

Put it this way, if one of the BPS crowd decided to take a libel action against someone on an internet forum for saying they are a liar they would first have to consider the whole picture that would potentially be presented on the issue in court. Even if the libel issue itself may not be...

Yes but you are being to harsh on even yourself. I do value your posts they are very well thought out and very poignant. Its just that many of us have just seem forums becoming impotent via tone policing in the past.

Yes but we are not in a court of law. We are in an internet members forum and are lay people talking exactly the same way people do in a pub or at any gathering. I really think you are going over the top Esther. I understand your concerns but I think you are overemphasizing the potential...

My understanding was that the government was placing a levy on certain soft drinks not that they are forcing soft drinks producers to reduce the sugar in their drinks. I'm not sure that will have any impact because massive companies like Coca Cola are extremely sharp with marketing and the...

How about chickens grown to full size within 6 weeks when the normal time would be 3 months because what they are being exposed to, then those chickens being consumed by us. How about the growth hormones injected into dairy cows to increase their milk production for us to consume.

I dont think its is necessarily that simple. The simplicity may be in the advice but the advice does not take people into account. Its a simple message to say drink less and you wont be an alcoholic but its actually a complex issue. I eat too much for example but you could put sweets and cakes...

Ah I think its my mistake then. Ive deleted the original post.

Am I mixing her up with someone else, I was pretty sure it had been discussed here numerous times?

Ye, ill even settle for a lost limb to grow back. Actually even a small end of a finger that's been lost in an industrial accident. Surely if you can think yourself better to reform cancerous tissue into healthy tissue you can grow back the end of your finger that's been cut off!!

They may well have had the hack job done on them by now wherby such groups get infiltrated divided to rule and then either disbanded or fall under complete controlled opposition. That tactic has happened since the beginning of time and is still flourishing now.

Yes I often think this, people can smoke cannabis or do heroine or get drunk to deal with symptoms of x y and z but all you are really doing is swapping symptoms. I sometimes think medicine is no different , especially when it comes to SSRIs. Also in clinical practice the SSRI is almost never...

Yes or visa versa wherby the change in protocol was a response to a required interest. Although, I'm just speculating I haven't looked at timings for any potential COIs or change in desired outcome shenanigans.

Especially as they changed the protocol during the trial after clearly having some insight to how the results were shaping up.

I've only just realised Sharpe was responding to Peter Tatchell here in the original tweet, not John Peters. What was the tweet that prompted Sharpes respone to Tatchell?