Search results

@Action for M.E. Hi Clare can you just set the record straight on what you think of Esther Crawley, her SMILE trial, her claims of threats using artist mock ups that she had been previously asked not to use by the artist and the fact that she says she received the threat directly to herself in...

Maybe its a misprint by the SMC and its supposed to be a fuckedsheet, as in, "we are fucked".

I basically meant that BACME is the BPS crowd, including Wessely who is at the top of communications when it comes to ME in the revolving door between the SMC, BACME the BPS crowd and the idea of giving awards to your mates.

Yes you are correct its the conferences they are considering merging. I still don't understand who gets to decide this and what's in it for the CMRC. Merging conferences is dodgy enough. Have the CMRC made a public statement on this issue? BACME is basically Peter White, Esther Crawley and the...

I just find it astonishing that BACME themselves get to decide if they merge with the CMRC, who the hell sent out the invitation? If this does happen then NOBODY has left the CMRC, not that I believe that anyone actually has 'left', in the same way I dont believe anyone can ever be a 'former' spy.

Yes, I mean si...I mean qui..err hai.... :confused: Doh!!!

The one doing the £600,000 functional neurological symtoms study for the CMRC to dump us in the BDD category.

She won't leave the field, she is going to her new role to grow the brand. She will use this job to do the governments bidding on declaring more children 'mentally ill', I dont think she has even left the CMRC, she's just got Edwards and the functional crowd on the inside, its all just a big game.

Told you!

I think it would not be acceptable for the CEO or a senior board member to come here and post without identifying themself. If more than one person is going to use the account it will be ludicrous if those people disagree with each other using one name. Or they could all just agree and toe a...

Obviously not, that's my whole point, its not for one person to hide behind a whole organization name and claim to speak for everyone without revealing themselves.

Andy I dont care who joins here in terms of disagreeing with them on past issues etc but surely we have a rule here, one person one account so how can an organization name join here without making it clear its a single person posting or not? Who exactly would one be debating against or agreeing...

Would it be OK for me to go over to AfME Facebook page or PR and post as s4me.info?

Who posts for them and can anyone in that whole organization use that single account and do they even have permission to speak on behalf of all their members without identifying themself?

My issue is with an organisation joining. Imagine if, "the goverment" joined or, Bristol University or the DWP. It's one person one account here and yes we dont have to use our own name but our posts here represent a single person behind such posts. If AfME has actually joined here we have to be...

How can an organisation join a forum? Who is the actual single named person who has joined here. I don't think an organisation funded by members should join a public forum and hide behind the organisation name, we should know the single named person we are talking to.

Sounds like a big bunch of bullshit.

My money is on a big promotion.

Everyone else is turning the lightbulb to get it out, while the BPS crowd is turning the whole ceiling and leaving the broken bulb in place in order to manoeuvre things the way they want. Eventually the whole house will come crashing down around them.

The psychologist would argue that they would just give the lightbulb the tools to change itself.