A question - what experiments do these data and the Zhang study, Fluge and Mella's recent paper etc suggest might be worthwhile that could run in parallel with SequenceME? Be it lab work or theraputic experiments or biopsies or autopsy studies. Anything that would be worthwhile that doesn't need...
In the interview with David Tuller that came out today, Chris Ponting says this gene is involved in suppressing the immune system, and therefore if it went wrong it could cause many things to go wrong.
I'm sure this is a (justified) oversimplification, so what is the more complex story?
Oh this is interesting. So you think the DecodeME results might have put paid to your hypothesis? Would we have definitely seen genes related to IFNG if it was involved, for example?
Are T cells 'safe' from this thought exercise or would they have been likely to have had genetic 'hits' as well...
Interesting and perhaps frustrating that he is still hot on antiviral therapies. I'd love to be proved wrong but I just think if that was the answer we would probably know by now.
Well the AI is really raining on my parade today! Lets hope its confidently incorrect on that front (not that I expect a drug tomorrow, nice as that would be...)
It's weird though, I searched the preprint for drug, treatment and theraputic and only really found this phase claiming that the...
And, it seems, large meticulous genetic studies can be ignored also. Facinating what it's possible to ignore if your faith in the almighty psychobehavioral paradigm is strong enough. Almost inspiring.
Yes I think they are trying to hold back the tide by painting this study as much more insignificant than it is, saying 'well we are still light years away from having any idea what is causing this' etc...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.