Tried to recreate the plot using the whole dataset:
I thought it started to deviate from the red line (which has a slope of 1) quite soon already from an observed -log10 p-value of 3. But the graph is a bit misleading because it is logarithmic so the vast majority of points are in the region...
Anecdotally I heard that the problems are mostly with bacterial infections, not so much with viral infections in severe ME/CFS. But I don't know if that is a consistent pattern.
But isn't that a peripheral neuropathy, one that wouldn't explain any of the core ME/CFS symptoms?
And why would a injury that is not severe cause much more debilitating fatigue symptoms than the severe CNS injuries that are already known?
If it is possible, it will probably have this special...
I don't understand why the prevalence of ME/CFS was so high in no-LC and control cases: how could it be 6.7% in people without Long Covid symptoms and 10% in controls? That's 20 times higher than common estimates of ME/CFS prevalence.
But wouldn't CNS injury be relatively easy to see on scans?
And wouldn't we have the same discrepancy as explained in the introduction: that the fatigue in CNS injury is often less than in ME/CFS and if CNS injury was involved wouldn't it eventually be visible as ME/CFS severity increases to...
Ah yes apologies. I think I'm a bit confused because those low p-values shown in the graph are in purple and for the category: 0.01 ≤ MAF < 0.04, but I thought that the hits found had MAF > 10%?
Agree with this. So my counterpoint would be that the theory does not really state this, just that it is more likely that the key to ME/CFS lies in the neural pathway involved in generating symptom perception. Whatever else will be found in the future, it will probably have some special...
Perhaps AIDS (before it was adequately treated) might also be a good comparison to highlight. This is an example of a persistent virus that causes widespread immune dysfunction, a popular theory in ME/CFS and Long Covid research.
Yet several physicians (Peterson, Klimas etc.) commented that...
By symptom burden I mean the fatigue/malaise/lack of energy and overall sense of feeling awful, not pain or suffering in general which in other disease can obviously be truly horrible.
I also get this lactic-acid feeling in my muscles and other patients suffer from weakness such as not being able to walk. But there are several reasons to think these are central rather than peripheral: due to things happening in the brain rather than in the muscle.
'oxygen tab gets closed...
I doubt it because we know what happens when those illnesses become more severe and it looks very different from ME/CFS. The pathology builds up and destroys parts of the body: muscles stop working, tumors develop, or there's brain damage, memory loss, joints get destroyed, organ failure, and...
Thanks for the comments @Grigor!
To clarify: it was not my intention to minimize things or argue that peripheral pathology isn't possible in ME/CFS or that it is stupid to suspect or research it. Also agree that we still know very little about ME/CFS, that it hasn't been well researched in the...
I also read that the intercept of an LD score regression can be interpreted in a similar way (an indicator of inflation). But I don't see this measure reported in the DecodeME preprint: anyone saw it somewhere?
Don't think we have discussed this plot yet:
Basically, the idea is that if the difference between groups is driven by selection bias, stratification effects, ancestry differences etc., then there will be lower p-values across the board. It would look like a systematic shift where many SNPs are...
Yes, the theory isn't very specific, but I don't think anyone can be at this stage.
It does predict that studying the neural pathways that cause sickness behavior and synapse communication involved in this will be more fruitful for ME/CFS than all the things the field is pursuing now.
I think...
I don't think so. I think if we found strong evidence of things like this, it would refute the theory.
It leaves some room for subtle peripheral pathology because biology likes to recycle things in different parts of the body. So whatever is causing the synapses to go wrong might cause some...
Could be both, I guess. My hunch is that they are different. For example that post-viral fatigue results in pressing the button of the symptom signal a bit longer, while ME/CFS is mainly about the button being broken (and constantly on).
For simplicity, I would place the pathology in (or as close to) the symptom-causing pathway itself. The pathways that interpret/evaluate signals coming from the body or help with the transmission of those signals seem less crucial.
A major difference is that thoughts and behavior do not really...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.