Yep. We have to persuade everyone that this time those in authority got it wrong. I think it's doable. It's happening already in some quarters, e.g., with academics willing to speak up about the PACE trial and all its flaws.
People are increasingly willing to accept that major institutions can...
https://valerieeliotsmith.com/2021/07/05/beyond-the-nice-guideline-mecomms-and-the-case-for-a-public-inquiry/
Lots to think about. We desperately need both a new comms & PR initiative and a public inquiry.
Yep. The release of the final guideline must be the start of a new campaign for properly funded, safe, adequate, specialist services - not some underfunded network of clinics with no central organisation, aims, or data keeping.
I don't think we know what exactly the PEM 'issue' is i.e., what was said that prompted a reanalysis, and by who? I can't quite work out the most probable explaination. If this was BPSers, what must they have said? what are they arguing for with respect to actual changes to the evidence base...
Minutes for a series of four guideline committee meetings in late April have just been uploaded: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/indevelopment/gid-ng10091/documents
It looks as though the meetings were to consider the recommendations in light of a new 'post-exertional malaise re-analysis'...
I really hate this 'app for everything' approach. My mum lives with IBD. She manages it with medication, but sometimes it flares for no good reason. I have no idea what this tool would offer her that she hasn't figured out herself through common sense.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210609-how-long-will-long-covid-last
I don't think this has been posted yet. Apologies if I missed it.
Reasonably good piece. Quite a few mentions of ME/CFS and speculation about the overlap and what's driving the illnesses.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.