I think this depends on whether PrecisionLife replicate those findings in the DecodeME cohort, which they are in the process of doing or may have already done.
But I am not a geneticist or even a scientist so take my answer with a grain of salt.
I wonder where they are getting their advice from? Surely not a certain jolly prof who's chummy with this Labour faction?
Whoever it's coming from they are harming kids to an almost unthinkable degree.
All because it's politically convient to forget covid. Never forget the widely publicised...
I'm hoping the inclusion of 9000 LC patients in SequenceME will help the two spheres coalesce somewhat. Although thats a couple years off and not funded yet as far as we know.
No worries, I believe so. I found these two links from a quick google. I think there is more info on S4ME but I am brain fogged right now!
https://www.omf.ngo/pediatrics-me-cfs-deep-omics-profiling-and-longitudinal-study/
https://www.omf.ngo/omf-scientist-receives-grant-in-australia/
Edit...
This makes intuitive sense to me but that is probably meaningless.
Two thoughts and you've probably already had both of them but just in case you havent:
Chris Armstrong's team are/were doing a study that involved sampling people in active PEM with home visits iirc, so he might be a good...
Does anyone know if Hanson's group are replicating this paper in a larger cohort?
it seems really interesting and I would really like to know if it stands up. Especially after PRDX6, which is higher 15 mins after exercise here, popped up in DecodeME.
That's interesting. I don't know very much about the biology of exercise but I think I follow just about!
Does anyone know if Hanson's group are replicating that paper in a larger cohort?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.