These results, however, underscore the importance of including neurophysiological endpoints in intervention research and highlight the need for developing more robust and individualized stimulation protocols. Future studies should consider extended stimulation regimens, alternative task...
Exactly.
How do they now it is (unjustified) stigma/fear of psychiatric diagnoses and therapies that is the problem, as opposed to those diagnoses and therapies being false, and useless, and sometimes a lot worse than merely useless, and hence the stigma and fear of them being entirely...
which aims to empower participants to manage their energy effectively,
At what point did the profession demonstrate having the requisite knowledge to be able usefully inform patients on this?
They want the responsibility, and hence the blame for failure, to be in our hands, while they retain the power to define us and our health issues and lecture us from on high about how to handle them.
IIRC, it depends on when the container was made, as the toxic paints stopped being used a few years back.
However, if it has a wood floor, then it may well be treated with strong persistent insecticides.
Apart from anything else, it shows considerable contempt for our hard earned experiential understanding of it, which is why they have to include a component in their definition that says we have perceptual pathology. They think that we are just ignorant delusional idiots.
It is a maddening and...
The issue is, of course, not the importance of subjective data. It has its place. The issue has always been: is it adequately controlled to reveal the known problems with subjective self-report data so they can be factored into the analysis?
If it has been then it is useful data. If it has not...
What this stuff looks like is nothing so much as very hard evidence in favour of Upton Sinclair's dictum that:
It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.
iCBT was also no better than treatment as usual.
"The effect of iCBT was not significantly different or slightly higher than treatment as usual after treatment"
So what additional benefit is it offering?
How many times can Horton be so wrong, behave so contrary to scientific and ethical principles, in such a blatant hypocritical manner, with such appalling consequences, and yet face zero accountability for it, and still remain so influential and honoured?
And he ain't alone.
Something sure is...
I am increasingly of the view that humans are rarely if ever sedentary (on a prolonged basis) for no good reason, and the real reasons for being sedentary rarely if ever include psycho-drama morality-play nonsense. That characterisation is just the superficial narrative mythologies we spin to...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.