Search results

Eh? He so clearly doesn't recognise that he/his work has been part of the problem.

Yes, my thought exactly. He's repositioning his image ahead of the debate. The switch in approach is so abrupt, it's almost as if someone gave him some PR advice.

Does David know that?

*speechless*

http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/20 18/06/14/journal-data-sharing-policies-are-moving-the-scientific-community-towards-greater-openness-but-clearly-more-work-remains/

The follow-up study has been published: https://neurosciencenews.com/autism-blood-test-9379

And also this,

Mike Godwin retweeted this,

@Graham, having carefully examined the evidence, I think @Jonathan Edwards has made you the exception to the rule by "liking" your video (either that or he momentarily forgot the rule in his awe...)

Another article by Steve Topple using ME and PACE as illustrative of current government policy, https://www.thecanary.co/opinion/2018/06/18/esther-mcvey-and-her-department-are-now-totally-out-of-control/

:rofl:

A new video by @Graham, the first in a series of three, explaining the PACE trial (about 8 mins),

I'm guessing he meant *yawn* childhood trauma, membership of support groups, perfectionism...