Search results

Not scientific then!

My issue is that this gives the BPS crowd three more years to pump out more shit just as Crawley has been doing and change the current NICE guidelines back to the same ones in three years or something even worse. If something is not fit for purpose why the F**k would you just carry on using it...

Art work for money.

This is true. We certainly don't want to fall into a trap. At the same time there still appears to be no provable trail to who actually said it to Wessely or who sent it to Crawley by email if any of these things happened. By that I also mean that even if such an email is produced that is not...

And yet she still hasn't seen the error of her ways? Funny that!

Is it possible that the wording is from an email she is claiming to have received but the Times mock up was done by the journalist?

I think this is a key issue in "EBM". The gold standard is often the best scoring bullshit on a subjective, data withheld, conflict of interest "study". On top of that its often the case, especially in psychiatry/psychology, that the "illness" is badly defined or never even existed in the first...

Since I got my varifocals last year my eyesight seems to have really deteriorated. I have just bought some ready readers because the varifocals are either now too weak or I am having problems adjusting between long and short vision. Its so frustrating trying to watch tv. I suppose I should go...