From some old notes about Wessely's role in it PACE:
The PACE trial identifier says: "(S)taff at the Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) [...] will be primarily responsible for randomisation and database design and management [...], directed by Professor Simon Wessely, in collaboration with Professor...
Generally a pretty good and welcome article. Thank you, Ms Bastian.
A couple of quibbles:
Well, they asked a single self-report question about it, which I wouldn't call a reliable measure.
Pacing is not about exercise, it is about managing existing limitations on daily activity. If pacing is...
So the first thing they should have done was establish the existence and nature of deconditioning, and measure activity.
The assumptions are always the first thing to test. Progress is usually made in science by abandoning an unjustified assumption or preconception.
But they have never tested...
It's an important step in the right direction. Credit where it is due.
Still one more important step to take though: There is no methodologically sound evidence that any psycho-social treatment actually delivers any rehabilitative, let alone curative, benefits.
It may (may) offer some generic...
Entirely deliberate on their part.
They have planted the most appallingly outrageous smears into every level of the debate, including portraying themselves as both the victims and heroes of the story, with minimal risk of those smears being properly tested, let alone being held to account for...
Agree with those who think that this forthcoming article is a sign that the work done by @dave30th is doing serious damage to the BPS clown show.
Also agree that we should wait and see what it actually says, and carefully consider our responses. Quite possible that we could use this to further...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.