Search results

Worth every penny, sir. :thumbup: :D

So why make the changes, and then defend them so ferociously, if they are of no significance? So the changes do make a significant difference? Make up your minds. :rolleyes: The whole damn point of PACE was to test those previous results and clinical experience. The PACE authors themselves...

The LP lunacy is something we can really bash them with in front of actual scientists.

I smell an election.

:D

Yeah, that was my first question about it. Those two plot lines are just a bit too neat and clean.

:cool:

@Esther12 Nice work. :thumbup: Can't have been much fun though. :ill: It is a straight propaganda hit job. Fails every basic standard of journalism, and fair debate. The question, as you note, is why? I can't come up with an explanation that is comforting.

I am flat out keeping up with a few threads here, and one or two links in them.

Having ME does not make one immune to getting other diseases, and vice-versa.

I was a student at various points in my life, but I have managed to avoid being a woman. :p

He is seriously pushing his luck on defamation, IMHO. I am increasingly of the view that this is their exit strategy. Create as much smear and obfuscation as possible in one final splurge, in order to further delay accountability, then leg it.

And its value in constructing a narrative, and (separately) in gaining and retaining power. he he

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself – and you are the easiest person to fool." Richard Feynman

Well said, Dan.

:D

With good reason: PACE required both primary measures (SF-36 & CFQ) to be positive to get an overall positive result for the trial. But, as I understand it, if they calculate the SF-36 results properly it will actually deliver a null result on that measure, and hence a null result overall. If...

I think we are in that phase, where people with no history in the debate are paying more attention and coming to their own conclusions. It was never going to end any other way. It was only ever a question of how long it would take.

I might have said something along those lines, once or thrice. Je ne regrette rien. :whistle:

It is quite clear that he is acting in very bad faith indeed. His efforts on Twitter, including selective blocking and non-answer 'answers', over the last year or so are nothing more than desperate trolling for bullshit examples of harassment/threats. But he got nothing serious he could use...