Search results

Yeah, I can even stick a graph on there to show daily views over time. Maybe even with the ability to show the graph for individual pages.

I'm guessing it's gotten significantly more popular with time, but they haven't upgraded their server/network to handle the higher traffic.

One thing you can do when the draft page is done and its contents copied over, since deleting isn't an option, is moving it (renaming it) to a page in the User namespace. On Wikipedia, it's common to have subpages on the userspace that are less polished or not super related to Wikipedia, that...

I think with every related condition, it's a big win for everyone because it's, effectively, more scientists working on the problem for both conditions. And once it's known they're related, the two groups can collaborate and share research. Plus the combined voices of patients are louder if...

It's often really slow for me on phone and computer, wifi and cellular.

Also:

Link to article By David Cox

Probably. I was thinking having a fan for good air circulation might help.

I did the first test. I did not detect cinnamon in all five 0 drop tubes as well as 4 drops and 8 drops. And also, strangely, 44 drops. I did smell cinnamon in the rest of them: 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 48 52 56 60 So I think I need to lower the concentration of all the tubes by about half...

Hmm.. I agree.

The five items they later added seem to help a bit: A Brief Questionnaire to Assess Post-Exertional Malaise

If you're correct that there was more improvement in the control but they decided to claim the herb helps because the intervention group did improve from baseline, I might cry.

Based on just the objective results claimed in the abstract, I'm not sure why you guys are dismissing this so easily. @SNT Gatchaman Can you paste any charts showing effect size? Also, do they go into more detail on the DePaul questionnaire? MEpedia says:

Oh lol okay I saw you add the note and hoped I could get to you before the page creation. Not a big deal. I did email the contact address for MEpedia yesterday to see if they can add a Draft namespace, we'll see if that works.

Actually, maybe don't make a Draft page. It looks like regular users can't delete pages, so after the draft is done, there will be an extra draft page in the Main namespace floating around for who knows how long, showing up in places like stats and Random page.

That's true. So I'd go to the question, why does it seem okay? Is it because there's actually some difference that matters morally in all these cases, or does it just feel that way because animals are so different? To me, it mostly seems like the latter, as well as because that's how it's...

REVERSE-LC was originally a pilot study and they converted it:

I can't find much on baricitinib and LC, but here's something: Demystifying Long COVID International Conference 2023, Abstract book, Page 22: Baricitinib, a Possible Therapeutic Option for Long COVID, Bertan et al

One two person LC case report I found on Twitter. Most evidence seems to be about acute COVID. https://www.s4me.info/threads/reverse-long-covid-19-with-baricitinib-study-reverse-lc.36979/#post-536631

I thought the norm was P-E-M until I heard someone during the NIH research roadmap webinar say "pem", and I've grown to prefer it because it doesn't sound as unwieldy. Similarly, ME/CFS sounds very long and clunky to me, and ME feels so much more natural, especially if repeating the acronym...