Agreed @Unable the dictionary definition of pacing yourself does hit the nail on the head we need to bring back yourself. ETA totally agree that the routine and structure stuff is dubious. It’s a fluctuating condition so trying to force people into a routine is putting square pegs in round...
like @Barry i find the idea of having an energy budget helps describe what pacing is like I’ve mentioned before @Keela Too s blog about disposable energy rings true
I think something like energy budgeting would work well as an alternative term for pacing...
Nope it may not be that common but I found it very easy to change to another GP Practice. And within practices there are often several Drs available. I only changed because the practice was relying on locums and I had very poor experience with them. My current GP practice is well run and...
Thanks for flagging this @Hutan @phil_in_bristol i can confirm that this booklet along with AFME booklet about employment/guide for employers are what I based my approach to ME/CFS in the first 18 months from diagnosis rather than resting for several months/a year I went back to work on gradual...
@Stewart i just assumed that the PACE authors would have been asked to comment on the points raised so would have been aware the letter was in the pipeline and maybe they were sent an advance copy which they then shared with SMC. In any event knowing the letter was coming they would have been...
Agreed and I guess if we say the AFME and MEA surveys are evdence of harm it’s difficult to then say there isn’t evidence that some people consider GET/CBT helped them.
i don’t understand the practicalities around press articles. If the journalist has finished it and it has been submitted to the editors is the timing of publication in the hands of the editors or does the journalist have any influence. Just wondering if it has been held back because they knew...
Wondering if, having been a response to a single question during the hearing before the Select Committee last year where J Montgomery said he was unsighted on the topic, this letter is weak enough for the Select Committee to consider calling him back to discuss?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.