So now that it has been confirmed that the local services do not perform even the most basic monitoring... what happens? This answer is clearly inadequate, deceitful in fact. There is no assessment of efficacy or safety by anyone. Nothing is actually being recorded as all the cases are treated...
It's also impossible to verify and dubious considering that there is no blinding and there is constant interaction with the participants.
It's as credible as saying a weight loss trial did not weigh anyone so they could not possibly know in advance whether there was any change. It's a context...
Pretty much the kind of issue a genuine "skeptic" would notice, leading to them understanding that it is underselling how fraudulent the PACE claims are. Exactly the kind of question an inquiring mind would ask, alongside "what do you mean by 'recovered'?"
If only professionals skeptics were...
That's a standard that is found throughout the psychosocial body of research: "clarifying" something by merely describing it in dry terms. It's not theft, it's removal of property without informed consent. Pretty much all the "clarifications" offered for PACE follow this model. Well, that and...
Which is definitely something that would be checked beforehand.
Otherwise it's like beginning work on a bridge and just hoping whatever municipality has jurisdiction on each side will say yes once you start digging. Makes no sense, it's a clear design flaw that should have disqualified the...
It's showing the cover of the current issue. The content management system controls it and it's just not set up to pull something specific for each article.
Common mistake and it's pretty sad that a publishing company would make it but whatever.
With just above it a "trending" Exercise Therapy May Benefit Chronic Fatigue. :sick:
Although that the best that can still be said at this time is "may", after 3 decades of insisting it would, is a serious indictment of how poor and aimless this body of research is. "May" is simply not the...
Honestly this is worse than doing nothing. It even tries to disappear that there ever was an issue at all. It's completely corrupt. And with Crawley a board member? This is like a microcosm of everything that can go wrong in medical research. It points to serious issues in the peer review and...
This isn't half-bad. Skimming through since there's a lot but at least it acknowledges most of the issues. Not sure if it will lead to anything but it's relatively good. Sliver lining but I don't see any of the usual overt bullshit, the ideologues did not bully their beliefs through.
One...
I don't think there is such a test so it's impossible to make that claim either way. The fluctuating nature alone falsifies it and the PACE researchers admitted themselves (in meeting notes) that participants are moderately active and therefore could not under any consideration be considered...
OMF has a study on some metals. I don't know if it will expand but Davis is looking at selenium and uranium using hair samples.
If that plays a role it would be very hard to find it without specifically looking for it. Everyone is exposed to toxic chemicals differently over the course of their...
Ah, yes, the well-known "pinky promise" process of validating bias in scientific research. Thoroughly validated and a seal of integrity that everyone knows to trust and respect.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.