I think it would be equally interesting and useful to hold groups of people who don’t use these approaches to find out why not and how they are affected by ME symptoms.
None of the movement is necessary or desirable, using a picture as background makes some of the text hard to read. They serve people who are likely to have cognitive difficulties.
The format should be as clean and uncluttered as possible.
This report about energy impairment may be interesting to you @Chesley
https://www.s4me.info/threads/centre-for-welfare-reform-report-energy-impairment-and-disability.14887/
Agree with others overall impression that this is a positive step. In the same way the NiCE guidelines were a positive step.
Just like the guidelines this isn’t a magic wand but does give a basis to get better outcomes in how NHS organisations and staff deal with pwme.
Hopefully some...
Definitely - its hitting the ball over the boundary a maximum score for one hit
here’s England captain hitting 3 consecutive 6s earlier this summer
https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/sports/cricket/12913428/ben-stokes-smashes-three-consecutive-sixes-to-reach-century-at-lords
I reckon it’s only going to be of interest to see if there’s a difference between results when in/ out of PEM for each of us using the same device. Comparing against others probably pointless.
Treatment could be used in the sense of what to do for pwME, how you as a medic should deal with someone who meets ME criteria - what C Shepherd calls management
Response time av 589. Not surprisingly as PEM today following dentist appointment yesterday and I didn’t go to sleep til 9 am
I got the same message about suboptimal alertness.
eta I will try to remember to give it a go on a non PEM day
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.