Search results

That could work. Only properly qualified charlatans should be allowed near patients.

Conceding that causality (and hence direction of causality) has not been established, instead of just assuming it has as per the normal BPS practice, is a step forward. Albeit from a very long way behind, and very late in the game. And way too late for Chalder, at least, to redeem herself.

Translation: If you have a bad day/week/life it is your fault. The circumstances of your life are irrelevant.

The empire franchise is on the march.

That there is what is known as a fair question.

I agree. The whole concept of a baseline is problematic.

Come on down, acausality.

Because apparently the greatest taboo in medicine is simply saying: 'We don't know.'

This.

The unspoken but implied message is “haul your head out of your arse.” It's not always unspoken and implied.

low doses of naltrexone Surely LDN will work this time? :rolleyes:

Yeah, you gotta be pretty dumb to try scamming with this disease. No easy roads here. Indeed, some of the hardest there is.

Maybe not totally uncharted. No mention at all of ME/CFS, nor MUS/PPS, etc. This is interesting: This is good news, if true: As to this: Nice plan. Good luck.

Hence the endlessly swirling stream of jargon.

DARVO

:D

I still find it difficult to comprehend the sheer scale of the opportunity costs from decades of, um, neglected or misdirected research.

The Big Lie is a thing, and it works, unfortunately.

And it was a Norwegian Blue.

Gotta admire their sheer chutzpah. They will smear anybody. Which is a very long list of enemies.