Ha! The university picks the dates. It doesn't really matter if people see it or if others jump in. I'm just not going to post on Facebook or Virology Blog or Twitter until the first.
The soft launch has started. The hard launch is on April 1st--that's when Berkeley formally announces all the campaigns. We're supposed to generate some interest by discretely sharing out links without posting it all over the universe yet. So here's mine...
I think now that the groundwork is there, other press coverage would help. Either by me or by others. I am trying to figure that one out now. Maximum public embarrassment is the only thing that will work.
Peter, I don't know. You only have to read the school absence paper to see it's not service evaluation. In the open peer review, a BPS colleague raised serious questions about the lack of ethical review. Crawley gave absurd non-answers, which I pointed out in my first post about the issue. The...
I am sure Ponting's response was not what SMC wanted to see. It demolishes the Stone statement and the absurd response from Sharpe et al. And why didn't they ask my BFF Esther Crawley to comment? Surely she would have given them a slam-dunk statement that despite any criticism, PACE remains a...
Looking at what they did and at that statement by Chalder, it is clear that they manipulated what they said to exaggerate the claims. Given that Chalder has never publicly, as far as I have seen, explained or retracted that comment, it is fair to hold her to it. They colluded with each other and...
whether I meant "other" or "wrong," the main point is that Australians themselves should not want me driving there!! I am happy to leave any driving to them.
To my friend Professor Edwards' points--I have to look at the hours again, but it's now 9:35 am Monday morning in SF and 3:35 am Tuesday morning in Melbourne. And we just moved ourselves forward an hour this past weekend, so I'm confused about the time shift. Why isn't that 18 hours ahead? Do we...
Well, and the 2016 highlight was really Alem Matthees' victory at the First-Tier Tribunal, which of course was what led to the reanalyses that she does highlight.
I hope people at Bristol have started to realize that she is becoming a liability. Universities don't usually like their faculty members to falsely accuse faculty at other well-known institutions of being libelous--not to mention in their inaugural addresses. They usually don't like their...
Thanks for flagging it. I had talked to her a few months ago. She seemed like a smart young woman. She came into this reporting really knowing very little about the issue, so she's done a terrific job. by all means, shower the article with positive comments!!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.