Search results

I think charging the DWP for each no brainer case it loses is not such a good idea as it will cost money to the public purse. Perhaps the individuals involved should be identified and have their incomes sanctioned to below the minimum income required to live on and should also be requested to...

I dont know I am just trying to understand what Lilpink is saying about Crawleys grandfather and a turned down scholarship to Oxford. I think its being suggested by Lilpink that Hugh Verity is Crawleys grandfather and Hugh Veritys wife turned down a scholarship at Oxford and is therefore...

So Hugh Verity is Crawleys grandfather and his wife gave up a scholarship at Oxford?

Really my question related to why would we would trust a negative finding more than a positive finding in science if, by quoting you.....

Is it only 80% in positive studies or is it also equally bad in negative finding studies?

I'm confused, surely two and more people could have given up scholarships at Oxford? Why do you think Crawleys Grandfather could not be one of many people who gave up a scholarship?

They retracted their paper after Mikovits paper was retracted and didnt offer an explanation as to how they only contaminated the patient samples and not the healthy control samples. Now Harvey Alter refuses to talk about MLVs saying its just time to move on from it.

In 2013 Lipkin found retroviruses in 85% of the sample pools in a study he did with Montaya. However four years later we still have no follow up on these samples and a conclusion to, "how they panned out". this is his direct quote form 2013........ @Inara I think this is the Lo Alter...

Did Lo and Alter also contaminate their samples in their initially positive claimed study?

Here she is in another guise.

Wow Germany must be slacking a little bit if you don't have the, "that's a conspiracy theory", line. Its a catch all. Evidence establishing is unnecessary in the equation when you can just use straw mans like, "I suppose you think there are lizards on the dark side of the moon too", when one...

I've never really understood the Cochrane review, even before I was ill and didn't follow science. It seems fairly obvious that if you gather up a load of accepted publications you are either collecting up a set of biases or a set of truths. Just being the collector is not sufficient to declare...

Shall we have a whip round to buy him a nightie?

That's the kind of question one needs to ask the FBI the CIA, Fox news and the BBC etc.