Search results

  1. Cheshire

    Resting-state functional connectivity, cognition, and fatigue in response to cognitive exertion: a novel study in adolescents with CFS (2019) Josev

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11682-019-00119-2
  2. Cheshire

    "Tired all the Time" (academic book) by Marie Thomas

    Posts relating to this article (Measurements of Recovery and Predictors of Outcome in an Untreated CFS Sample (2019) Thomas et al.) have been moved to a new thread.
  3. Cheshire

    More PACE trial data released

    The overlap between entry and recovery criteria is also something that is easily understandable by non scientific people. (At entry, 65 is a score considered to correspond to great disabilty, but the same result (65) is used as a sign of recovery at the end of the trial).
  4. Cheshire

    Assessment of the scientific rigour of RCTs on the effectiveness of CBT and GET for ME/CFS: a systematic review (2019) Ahmed et al

    I don't really understand what his point exactly is... Edit: Tweet deleted, see @Esther12 post below.
  5. Cheshire

    More PACE trial data released

    Doesn't every patient have a number assigned? If so, why didn't QMUL provide it?
  6. Cheshire

    Assessment of the scientific rigour of RCTs on the effectiveness of CBT and GET for ME/CFS: a systematic review (2019) Ahmed et al

    For a bit of background, about the authors (all working for Panaxea, "an independent consultancy company spun-out from the University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands") http://panaxea.eu/who-we-are/ I wonder why they did this review and who paid for it.
  7. Cheshire

    More PACE trial data released

    And it proves that, unlike what they claimed, it's still possible to access the data.
  8. Cheshire

    More PACE trial data released

    What an achievement! Thanks a lot @JohnTheJack
  9. Cheshire

    A nanoelectronics-blood-based diagnostic biomarker for ME/CFS (2019) Esfandyarpour, Davis et al

    Posts relating to Simon Wessely have been moved to this thread.
  10. Cheshire

    Cognitive behavioural therapy for ME/chronic fatigue syndrome is not effective. Re-analysis of a Cochrane review, 2019, Vink & Vink-Niese

    As a reminder, the authors have alreay published an article on the Cochrane review (see here). We discussed it here. Edit: about the exercice review, while the new one is about CBT, thanks @Trish
  11. Cheshire

    Special Report - Online activists are silencing us, scientists say Reuters March 2019

    Trial By Error: A Reuters Update http://www.virology.ws/2019/04/18/trial-by-error-a-reuters-update/
  12. Cheshire

    A general thread on the PACE trial!

    A quick sum up of the flaws of the PACE trial
  13. Cheshire

    Hyperactivation of proprioceptors induces microglia-mediated long-lasting pain in a rat model of chronic fatigue syndrome - Mar 2019 - Yasui et al

    Seems like others are fed up of mice & rats models (a new and still young but promising twitter account):
  14. Cheshire

    David Tuller: Trial By Error: My Letter to Professor Hotopf About Bristol's School Absence Study

    Trial By Error: My Latest Letter to Bristol http://www.virology.ws/2019/04/09/trial-by-error-my-latest-letter-to-bristol/
  15. Cheshire

    David Tuller - Trial By Error: This Year’s US Clinician Summit

    Jackson laboratory's blog on the summit: BHC: Second Annual Meeting for ME/CFS Clinician Coalition https://jaxmecfs.com/2019/04/09/bhc-second-annual-meeting-for-me-cfs-clinician-coalition/
  16. Cheshire

    Quantitative separation of the depressive phase of Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder using Electrovestibulography (2019) Lithgow et al.

    This left me perplexed. Is it complete quackery or a promising diagnostic method? https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15622975.2019.1599143?journalCode=iwbp20
  17. Cheshire

    CFS chapter in Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine

    Changes: reference to the Cochrane review and the PACE trial in the treatment part new paragraph about the mechanism of change: Relies on Chalder's research, so just a big joke Another ridiculous claim (already in the former edition though): (even with their biased methodology, there is...
Back
Top Bottom