And which specifically encourages patients to view their symptoms in a different manner, and hence bias the reporting of outcomes.
It is blatant systematic biasing of methodology from the start.
integrated, multidisciplinary care models
multidisciplinary pathways
patient-centred
patient-practitioner collaborative model
complex, multi-system conditions.
Why am I not feeling confident about this?
“we are beginning to realize that there is this whole world out there that we had absolutely no insight into.”
Not for the first time in the history of medicine, and undoubtedly not for the last.
The problem is that the profession does not seem to learn the lesson from this clear history.
Relevant studies were identified through a non-systematic search of major electronic databases
Not a useful contribution, then.
multidisciplinary care
:facepalm:
+1
The more of my life has been destroyed this disease, the more openly hostile I become to false hope. It is the worst possible response, and both the medical profession and patients need to stop indulging in it.
If there is currently no realistic explanation and effective treatment – and...
That list is why I constantly bang on about the lack of adequate control in rehab/psychosomatic/BPS studies. They are simply not controlling for all this stuff, and the effect sizes alone that they are getting in the rehab treatment arms are not big enough to rule out those confounders.
All...
Good article.
ME patients can sometimes short-term push outside our energy envelope, but as one physician said, if you do that it’s like borrowing money from the mob – you will pay and then some.
There it is.
That is exactly what happens.
Then clinicians pat themselves on the back for having 'successfully treated' the patient. By which they really mean they have successfully fobbed the patient off and don't have to worry about dealing with them and being confronted with the reality of having failed...
Ugh, a giant block of text. :ill:
I added paragraph breaks, though still a few formatting issues, possibly due to a machine translation. But much more readable now.
Not a perfect article, still a bit of biobabble. But pretty good overall, and includes a lot of the criticisms about the whole...
And mainstream medicine's historical and ongoing contribution to that.
Broadly speaking, yes. Certainly a damn sight more than is the current situation.
But as we know from hard experience individual patients and patient advocacy groups are not always the best judge of that.
It is ridiculous...
Both Coles and Woolworths supermarkets have extended their quiet hour to every weekday, from 10:30-11:30am.
(Happened early last year but I missed it.)
Rehabilitation professionals are trained to work productively in uncertainty, to intervene without full mechanistic explanation, and to build clinical legitimacy around trajectories of function rather than lesions.
Utter drivel.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.